5.0 or greater
Posted by Barbara on February 19, 2006 at 12:13:30:

The last 5.0M or greater to hit California was back on Sept 2 when a 5.1M struck near Obsidian Butte. Before that, there was a 5.2M near Anza on June 12. And before that, there was a 5.2M near Wheeler Ridge on April 16.

These are the only 5.0M or greater earthquakes that I see for California last year. It has now been almost 6 months since the last one.

According to Berkeley's website: http://seismo.berkeley.edu/seismo/faq/rate_of_seism.html
California averages annually for 5.0M and greater:

5.0 to 5.4 -- 6.8 earthquakes per year
5.5 to 5.9 -- 2.2 " " "
6.0 to 6.4 -- 1.2 " " "
6.5 to 6.9 -- 0.6 " " "

We are presently "deficient" in larger magnitude earthquakes.

When is the next one of 5.0 or greater magnitude going to strike in California? Forget predicting the "where." California is the "where."

Out of curiosity, does anyone know the longest stretch California has gone without a 5.0 or greater in our very short recorded geological recorded history?

Barbara


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Barbara  13:55:35 - 2/19/2006  (33911)  (1)
        ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Don in Hollister  15:06:36 - 2/19/2006  (33914)  (1)
           ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Barbara  15:39:19 - 2/19/2006  (33915)  (0)
     ● Re: 5.0 or greater - glen  12:47:47 - 2/19/2006  (33903)  (1)
        ● Re: 5.0 or greater - glen  12:57:46 - 2/19/2006  (33904)  (2)
           ● short answer: we don't think so - John Vidale  14:54:02 - 2/19/2006  (33913)  (2)
              ● Re: short answer: we don't think so - Petra  17:23:02 - 2/19/2006  (33918)  (1)
                 ● if I read you right - John Vidale  20:04:58 - 2/19/2006  (33922)  (1)
                    ● Re: if I read you right - Not Really - Petra  20:32:17 - 2/19/2006  (33925)  (1)
                       ● chatting here is a hobby - John Vidale  21:14:22 - 2/19/2006  (33927)  (1)
                          ● I'm Sorry, You're Under-appreciated. - Petra  05:19:24 - 2/20/2006  (33935)  (1)
                             ● Re: I'm Sorry, You're Under-appreciated. - John Vidale  06:58:46 - 2/20/2006  (33936)  (1)
                                ● Suppression of Information - Petra  12:06:17 - 2/20/2006  (33947)  (1)
                                   ● difference of opinion - John Vidale  13:31:56 - 2/20/2006  (33966)  (2)
                                      ● Re: difference of opinion - Russell  14:29:57 - 2/20/2006  (33973)  (1)
                                         ● Re: difference of opinion - Don in Hollister  15:14:02 - 2/20/2006  (33980)  (0)
                                      ● Re: difference of opinion - Jim W.  14:07:07 - 2/20/2006  (33972)  (0)
              ● Re: short answer: we don't think so - glen  15:58:42 - 2/19/2006  (33917)  (1)
                 ● how near in the future? - John Vidale  20:15:43 - 2/19/2006  (33923)  (1)
                    ● Re: how near in the future? - glen  21:30:45 - 2/19/2006  (33928)  (1)
                       ● yes, 6+ likely to come sooner - John Vidale  21:33:20 - 2/19/2006  (33929)  (1)
                          ● Agreed. Thanks. n/t - glen  22:11:26 - 2/19/2006  (33932)  (0)
           ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Don in Hollister  13:01:51 - 2/19/2006  (33907)  (1)
              ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Barbara  07:14:07 - 2/20/2006  (33937)  (1)
                 ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Don in Hollister  11:02:19 - 2/20/2006  (33940)  (1)
                    ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Barbara  22:37:00 - 2/20/2006  (34019)  (2)
                       ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:43:57 - 2/21/2006  (34027)  (1)
                          ● Re: 5.0 or greater - Barbara  19:11:45 - 2/21/2006  (34044)  (0)
                       ● Re: 5.0 or greater - glen  00:13:07 - 2/21/2006  (34022)  (0)