Re: difference of opinion
Posted by Russell on February 20, 2006 at 14:29:57:

So far, the only predictive model that makes any sense to me - or seems to have any chance of working - is the one that says "Its happened before. It will happen again. Get ready."

No offense to anyone, but I see the predictions here for 1.2s and 2.3s etc and they may or may not happen (I think Don gets more hits than anyone) but I think to myself "Who cares?" I am always surprised when the big squares pop up on the screen but am never surprised to see that no one said I should expect to see it.

I don't know about Petra's vast science wing conspiracy, but I wonder what that point of such a thing would be. Additionaly, I haven't so far seen on shred of evidence to suggest that EQs are anything but random events occuring at irregular intervals in sporadic locations. The only commonality is California.

So, what to do?? Well, its happened before. It will happen again. Get ready. Thats my prediction and I can guarantee its 100% historically and predictivley accurate.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: difference of opinion - Don in Hollister  15:14:02 - 2/20/2006  (33980)  (0)