Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com
Posted by Cal on April 15, 2006 at 11:14:20:

"Were there counts taken of the number of animals killed?" Good question despite international media coverage about how many did live. Also, even if the government did tally 'em up--how could they be trusted? We're still in a fog about the SF 1906 quake-fire death toll. It's now 3,000 and counting. Why would the counts for animals be accurate?

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Russell  12:07:44 - 4/15/2006  (36348)  (1)
        ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Cal  15:27:55 - 4/15/2006  (36349)  (3)
           ● Fires? - John Vidale  18:16:13 - 4/15/2006  (36356)  (1)
              ● Re: Fires? - Cal  20:01:19 - 4/15/2006  (36357)  (1)
                 ● Re: Fires? - Skywise  21:05:36 - 4/15/2006  (36359)  (1)
                    ● Re: Fires? - Cal  22:36:45 - 4/15/2006  (36368)  (2)
                       ● Re: Fires? - Skywise  00:47:42 - 4/16/2006  (36375)  (0)
                       ● smelling smoke or more? - John Vidale  23:05:50 - 4/15/2006  (36370)  (0)
           ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Russell  16:56:07 - 4/15/2006  (36354)  (1)
              ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Cal  20:10:01 - 4/15/2006  (36358)  (1)
                 ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Russell  21:52:08 - 4/15/2006  (36360)  (2)
                    ● Russell, I'd like to pursue that - Roger Hunter  22:38:47 - 4/15/2006  (36369)  (0)
                    ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Russell   22:32:01 - 4/15/2006  (36367)  (0)
           ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Don in Hollister  16:10:03 - 4/15/2006  (36351)  (1)
              ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - glen  16:36:00 - 4/15/2006  (36353)  (2)
                 ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Cal  16:00:05 - 4/16/2006  (36381)  (2)
                    ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Skywise  20:59:35 - 4/16/2006  (36385)  (1)
                       ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - glen  21:31:07 - 4/16/2006  (36386)  (2)
                          ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Skywise  13:47:25 - 4/17/2006  (36392)  (1)
                             ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - glen  14:20:07 - 4/17/2006  (36395)  (1)
                                ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Skywise  16:58:05 - 4/17/2006  (36397)  (2)
                                   ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  18:06:18 - 4/17/2006  (36399)  (2)
                                      ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Cathryn  14:38:43 - 4/19/2006  (36454)  (0)
                                      ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - glen  18:49:56 - 4/17/2006  (36400)  (0)
                                   ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - glen  17:30:07 - 4/17/2006  (36398)  (0)
                          ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Don in Hollister  21:52:46 - 4/16/2006  (36387)  (0)
                    ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - glen  16:22:09 - 4/16/2006  (36384)  (1)
                       ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Canie  12:16:52 - 4/18/2006  (36407)  (0)
                 ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - Don in Hollister  00:01:07 - 4/16/2006  (36372)  (1)
                    ● Re: Sensitives Article msnbc.com - glen  00:34:39 - 4/16/2006  (36373)  (0)