|
earthquake nucleation |
Briefly, the current thinking, although not all agree, is that the sliding in an earthquake starts days aheads of time, starting imperceptibly slowly and accelerating for weeks until it achieves rates comparable with seismic waves - km/s crack speeds and m/s particle velocities. Two problems keep us from finding the "nucleation zone" - (1) it is probably very small, perhaps 1-10 m, (2) the slow precursory slip is tiny, much of the time microns per second or less. Some seismologists don't think such a phase even exists. The theory is called rate-and-state friction, and it has been associated with Jim's name. Follow Ups: ● Re: earthquake nucleation - Don in Hollister 11:38:20 - 1/19/2005 (24473) (2) ● Say what? - Cathryn 06:23:34 - 1/23/2005 (24527) (1) ● you're probably right - John Vidale 08:10:50 - 1/23/2005 (24534) (1) ● Re: you're probably right - Cathryn 08:14:06 - 1/23/2005 (24536) (1) ● not that surprising - John Vidale 08:30:33 - 1/23/2005 (24540) (0) ● excellent hearing - John Vidale 15:18:07 - 1/19/2005 (24474) (1) ● Re: excellent hearing - Don in Hollister 16:25:50 - 1/19/2005 (24476) (1) ● Fun with sounds - Petra 17:25:07 - 1/19/2005 (24478) (2) ● Sound theories are few and far between - Ara 22:39:51 - 1/19/2005 (24480) (2) ● Re: Sound theories are few and far between - Cathryn 07:00:04 - 1/23/2005 (24529) (0) ● Re: Sound theories are few and far between - Don in Hollister 02:11:40 - 1/20/2005 (24482) (1) ● Unilateral Foghorn Observations - Ara 06:55:21 - 1/20/2005 (24483) (0) ● the same theory says ... - John Vidale 18:06:47 - 1/19/2005 (24479) (1) ● Nucleating Quake Questions - Ara 01:34:37 - 1/20/2005 (24481) (1) ● no much to say, really - John Vidale 10:02:39 - 1/20/2005 (24485) (1) ● Could be it might have been better not to say anything in the first place, then - Ara 18:57:05 - 1/20/2005 (24495) (1) ● in search of quibbling contradiction - John Vidale 21:58:36 - 1/20/2005 (24498) (3) ● Re: in search of quibbling contradiction - Cathryn 06:47:58 - 1/23/2005 (24528) (1) ● have a favorite reference? - John Vidale 08:12:11 - 1/23/2005 (24535) (1) ● Actually, yes - Cathryn 09:07:15 - 1/23/2005 (24545) (1) ● there were foreshocks - John Vidale 10:28:01 - 1/23/2005 (24556) (1) ● confused Haicheng with Tangshan - Cathryn 10:41:34 - 1/23/2005 (24557) (0) ● Not quibbling at all - Ara 01:10:59 - 1/21/2005 (24501) (1) ● our statement - John Vidale 07:05:12 - 1/21/2005 (24503) (2) ● The ebb and flow of untestable ideas - Ara 06:05:50 - 1/22/2005 (24510) (2) ● angels dancing on the head of a pin - John Vidale 08:02:30 - 1/22/2005 (24512) (1) ● Pin heads dancing with angels - Ara 09:39:08 - 1/22/2005 (24513) (2) ● you're drifted into offensive remarks - John Vidale 16:45:19 - 1/22/2005 (24518) (1) ● You have drifted into excuses - Ara 18:17:21 - 1/22/2005 (24519) (0) ● Re: Pin heads dancing with angels - Canie 11:10:35 - 1/22/2005 (24516) (1) ● On the criticism - Ara 18:33:04 - 1/22/2005 (24520) (1) ● really? - John Vidale 18:54:27 - 1/22/2005 (24521) (1) ● Oh come on. - Ara 20:45:25 - 1/22/2005 (24522) (1) ● I get it - John Vidale 21:00:09 - 1/22/2005 (24523) (1) ● I did not get it - Ara 01:56:43 - 1/23/2005 (24526) (0) ● grammar correction - Ara 06:18:02 - 1/22/2005 (24511) (1) ● Insults - Cathryn 08:09:02 - 1/23/2005 (24533) (2) ● Aggravation - Ara 23:50:27 - 1/23/2005 (24558) (1) ● clear illustration of Ara's clarity of thought - John Vidale 01:50:28 - 1/24/2005 (24559) (1) ● Ara's clear clarity - Ara 02:27:28 - 1/24/2005 (24560) (1) ● Re: Ara's clear clarity - Cathryn 08:07:11 - 1/24/2005 (24561) (1) ● Re:respect - Ara 16:50:40 - 1/24/2005 (24567) (1) ● Re:respect - Cathryn 19:42:29 - 1/24/2005 (24573) (1) ● very clear - John Vidale 21:26:32 - 1/24/2005 (24577) (1) ● Re: very clear - Cathryn 04:45:57 - 1/25/2005 (24585) (0) ● thanks - John Vidale 08:32:51 - 1/23/2005 (24541) (1) ● Re: thanks - Cathryn 08:44:13 - 1/23/2005 (24542) (0) ● For John And Ara. Speculation And Theory - Don in Hollister 13:03:06 - 1/21/2005 (24505) (2) ● Re: For John And Ara. Speculation And Theory - Cathryn 08:18:45 - 1/23/2005 (24537) (0) ● You left out hypothesis n/t - Roger Hunter 13:11:50 - 1/21/2005 (24506) (1) ● Re: You left out hypothesis n/t - Canie 17:53:15 - 1/21/2005 (24508) (2) ● Re: You left out hypothesis n/t - Cathryn 08:22:53 - 1/23/2005 (24538) (0) ● Re: You left out hypothesis n/t - Roger Hunter 20:20:31 - 1/21/2005 (24509) (1) ● Re: You left out hypothesis n/t - Cathryn 08:25:48 - 1/23/2005 (24539) (0) ● The Crest of the Wave - Petra 22:41:25 - 1/20/2005 (24500) (0) |
|