clear illustration of Ara's clarity of thought
Posted by John Vidale on January 24, 2005 at 01:50:28:

(1) The gap in logic - just because I did not list it, it must not have been insulting?
(2) "pin head" is not insulting?
(3) "pin head" is no more insulting than "angels dancing on the head of a pin"?
(4) the idea that "pin head" is aggravating is "not very scientific", and
(5) there were no insults at all, my post which quoted him verbatim is a false accusation.

Follow Ups:
     ● Ara's clear clarity - Ara  02:27:28 - 1/24/2005  (24560)  (1)
        ● Re: Ara's clear clarity - Cathryn  08:07:11 - 1/24/2005  (24561)  (1)
           ● Re:respect - Ara  16:50:40 - 1/24/2005  (24567)  (1)
              ● Re:respect - Cathryn  19:42:29 - 1/24/2005  (24573)  (1)
                 ● very clear - John Vidale  21:26:32 - 1/24/2005  (24577)  (1)
                    ● Re: very clear - Cathryn  04:45:57 - 1/25/2005  (24585)  (0)