|
Nucleating Quake Questions |
John, You wrote, gthe same theory says ...that all of the thousands of tiny earthquakes occurring every day probably nucleate in a way indistinguishable from the way large earthquakes nucleate.h What does the term gearthquake nucleationh mean? Does nucleation here mean gTo form something into a nucleush? I do not understand how your initial description of the accelerating movements constitutes a nucleation. Since this is supposedly a gtheoryh, I guess there is some rationale as to why tiny earthquakes would nucleate in a way indistinguishable from large earthquakes. Is that so? It would be interesting to have found something that does not vary regardless of earthquake size, but it is not clear what that might be, why it is so, and what phenomena are predicted by this theory that would provide confirmation if observed. Ara Follow Ups: ● no much to say, really - John Vidale 10:02:39 - 1/20/2005 (24485) (1) ● Could be it might have been better not to say anything in the first place, then - Ara 18:57:05 - 1/20/2005 (24495) (1) ● in search of quibbling contradiction - John Vidale 21:58:36 - 1/20/2005 (24498) (3) ● Re: in search of quibbling contradiction - Cathryn 06:47:58 - 1/23/2005 (24528) (1) ● have a favorite reference? - John Vidale 08:12:11 - 1/23/2005 (24535) (1) ● Actually, yes - Cathryn 09:07:15 - 1/23/2005 (24545) (1) ● there were foreshocks - John Vidale 10:28:01 - 1/23/2005 (24556) (1) ● confused Haicheng with Tangshan - Cathryn 10:41:34 - 1/23/2005 (24557) (0) ● Not quibbling at all - Ara 01:10:59 - 1/21/2005 (24501) (1) ● our statement - John Vidale 07:05:12 - 1/21/2005 (24503) (2) ● The ebb and flow of untestable ideas - Ara 06:05:50 - 1/22/2005 (24510) (2) ● angels dancing on the head of a pin - John Vidale 08:02:30 - 1/22/2005 (24512) (1) ● Pin heads dancing with angels - Ara 09:39:08 - 1/22/2005 (24513) (2) ● you're drifted into offensive remarks - John Vidale 16:45:19 - 1/22/2005 (24518) (1) ● You have drifted into excuses - Ara 18:17:21 - 1/22/2005 (24519) (0) ● Re: Pin heads dancing with angels - Canie 11:10:35 - 1/22/2005 (24516) (1) ● On the criticism - Ara 18:33:04 - 1/22/2005 (24520) (1) ● really? - John Vidale 18:54:27 - 1/22/2005 (24521) (1) ● Oh come on. - Ara 20:45:25 - 1/22/2005 (24522) (1) ● I get it - John Vidale 21:00:09 - 1/22/2005 (24523) (1) ● I did not get it - Ara 01:56:43 - 1/23/2005 (24526) (0) ● grammar correction - Ara 06:18:02 - 1/22/2005 (24511) (1) ● Insults - Cathryn 08:09:02 - 1/23/2005 (24533) (2) ● Aggravation - Ara 23:50:27 - 1/23/2005 (24558) (1) ● clear illustration of Ara's clarity of thought - John Vidale 01:50:28 - 1/24/2005 (24559) (1) ● Ara's clear clarity - Ara 02:27:28 - 1/24/2005 (24560) (1) ● Re: Ara's clear clarity - Cathryn 08:07:11 - 1/24/2005 (24561) (1) ● Re:respect - Ara 16:50:40 - 1/24/2005 (24567) (1) ● Re:respect - Cathryn 19:42:29 - 1/24/2005 (24573) (1) ● very clear - John Vidale 21:26:32 - 1/24/2005 (24577) (1) ● Re: very clear - Cathryn 04:45:57 - 1/25/2005 (24585) (0) ● thanks - John Vidale 08:32:51 - 1/23/2005 (24541) (1) ● Re: thanks - Cathryn 08:44:13 - 1/23/2005 (24542) (0) ● For John And Ara. Speculation And Theory - Don in Hollister 13:03:06 - 1/21/2005 (24505) (2) ● Re: For John And Ara. Speculation And Theory - Cathryn 08:18:45 - 1/23/2005 (24537) (0) ● You left out hypothesis n/t - Roger Hunter 13:11:50 - 1/21/2005 (24506) (1) ● Re: You left out hypothesis n/t - Canie 17:53:15 - 1/21/2005 (24508) (2) ● Re: You left out hypothesis n/t - Cathryn 08:22:53 - 1/23/2005 (24538) (0) ● Re: You left out hypothesis n/t - Roger Hunter 20:20:31 - 1/21/2005 (24509) (1) ● Re: You left out hypothesis n/t - Cathryn 08:25:48 - 1/23/2005 (24539) (0) ● The Crest of the Wave - Petra 22:41:25 - 1/20/2005 (24500) (0) |
|