I doubt you're still listening, but here is what bothered me about your messages.

This last message (http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/24513.html):

"Your many posts are devoid of any detail that might suggest you are effectively combining indirect evidence to solve any problem at all."
"you seem unable to state clearly and succinctly ... "
"I do not wish to be subjected to gross distortions"

your previous message (http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/24510.html):

"[your model] does not ?predict? anything"
"your reasoning ... is meaningless"
"[why do scientists] enjoy the luxury of contemplating untestable speculation and calling it theory?"
"That is not how science progresses"

the one before that (http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/24501.html):

"Certainly, I never intend to be insulting with remarks."

the before that one (http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/24495.html):

"Publicizing such speculation with qualifications, but without any clarity, seems to serve no other purpose than PR."

However, your posts before that had a more level-headed tone.