|
Earthquakes and the sun – Earth – moon angle |
This is a fresh thread on this subject. The last one was getting too far to the side of the page. If this subject is going to be investigated thoroughly then I would recommend that a Web site be established where information regarding it, publication abstracts, different plots etc. can be stored so that people can keep track what has already been done. The following data would probably need to be collected and worked with at a minimum: *** Earthquake magnitude The orientation of the fault zone, north – south or east – west etc. should also be important. But that might be difficult data to collect for a beginning study. It is important to consider that you can have a situation where the sun can be above 20N while the moon is above 20S. So in addition to the longitude angle between the sun and the moon positions there is also that latitude angle to consider. The result is that the number of possible studies involving all of those variables is rather large. But these types of studies are easy to do with a good spreadsheet program. And I feel that it is probably worth the effort if someone wants to do the work. I have already done some of the studies myself and know of some publications involving this type of research. That can be helpful. Follow Ups: ● EQF's prediction program - Roger Hunter 17:42:35 - 8/7/2004 (22357) (1) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF 18:46:18 - 8/7/2004 (22359) (1) ● EQF's prediction program - Roger Hunter 18:59:12 - 8/7/2004 (22360) (2) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF 19:08:48 - 8/7/2004 (22363) (0) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - Don in Hollister 19:06:26 - 8/7/2004 (22362) (1) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF 19:20:23 - 8/7/2004 (22364) (2) ● EQF's prediction program - Roger Hunter 19:47:25 - 8/7/2004 (22366) (1) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF 21:57:35 - 8/8/2004 (22383) (1) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - Don in Hollister 23:19:16 - 8/8/2004 (22389) (0) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - Don in Hollister 19:47:10 - 8/7/2004 (22365) (1) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - chris in suburbia 05:00:46 - 8/8/2004 (22369) (3) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF 22:33:30 - 8/8/2004 (22384) (0) ● not much time on EDG - John Vidale 09:33:06 - 8/8/2004 (22372) (2) ● And that summarizes the problem - EQF 22:52:34 - 8/8/2004 (22386) (1) ● name just a single expert that I can call - John Vidale 23:04:20 - 8/8/2004 (22387) (1) ● Re: name just a single expert that I can call - Don in Hollister 23:55:00 - 8/8/2004 (22390) (0) ● let me restate that - John Vidale 22:49:32 - 8/8/2004 (22385) (0) ● You Hit The Nail On The Head - Don in Hollister 07:55:31 - 8/8/2004 (22370) (1) ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - Cathryn 13:43:09 - 8/9/2004 (22394) (1) ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - EQF 14:48:02 - 8/9/2004 (22400) (1) ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - Cathryn 16:18:19 - 8/9/2004 (22401) (1) ● A past prediction - EQF 16:34:04 - 8/9/2004 (22402) (8) ● A past prediction - Roger Hunter 21:52:33 - 8/9/2004 (22421) (0) ● How about your prediction 7 months later? - John Vidale 19:04:02 - 8/9/2004 (22417) (0) ● How about your prediction 6 months later? - John Vidale 18:58:10 - 8/9/2004 (22415) (0) ● How about your prediction 3 months earlier? - John Vidale 18:40:51 - 8/9/2004 (22413) (0) ● How about your prediction 2 months earlier? - John Vidale 18:31:42 - 8/9/2004 (22411) (2) ● Re: How about the most recent one? - Don in Hollister 21:08:43 - 8/9/2004 (22419) (0) ● Re: How about your prediction 2 months earlier? - Cathryn 18:59:27 - 8/9/2004 (22416) (0) ● Re: A past prediction - Cathryn 17:14:09 - 8/9/2004 (22405) (0) ● that prediction missed, and didn't use orbital data - John Vidale 17:03:02 - 8/9/2004 (22404) (2) ● Willing to play devil's advocate - Cathryn 17:59:43 - 8/9/2004 (22409) (0) ● Re: that prediction missed, and didn't use orbital data - Cathryn 17:36:23 - 8/9/2004 (22406) (1) ● google "groups" - John Vidale 17:44:49 - 8/9/2004 (22407) (1) ● I meant button, of course (nm) - John Vidale 17:45:51 - 8/9/2004 (22408) (1) ● Re: I meant button, of course (nm) - Cathryn 18:38:02 - 8/9/2004 (22412) (0) ● Re: A past prediction - Cathryn 16:53:10 - 8/9/2004 (22403) (1) ● Re: A past prediction - EQF 23:49:03 - 8/9/2004 (22422) (0) |
|