Todd posted a while ago that we should lay off EQF. However, every now and then, if someone is making claims that we believe are not correct, I think it appropriate that we criticize these claims....it goes to the credibility of the page and the people who post here. I'm a little surprised that John V. spends so much time looking into EQFs results. Wouldn't it be more interesting if John spent the same time posting some of his, his student's, and other's results/ideas of interest? I think the thing that is frustrating about EQF to some, maybe me if I had not given up a long time ago, is that he/she is spending an awful lot of effort, but the way he/she is going about it, and the claims for brilliance, make it unlikely that either he/she will come up with anything that work, or if he/she does come up with something, it will not be taken seriously. I'm not making any statement here about whether or not EQF's methods work, because I have not spent the time to make sense of EQF's web page...or have not even looked at it in a long time. But, the way EQF has just made statements about eartones and space weather without backing them up...just stating that these things are related to earthquakes, makes me skeptical.
Chris