EQF's prediction program
Posted by Roger Hunter on August 07, 2004 at 18:59:12:

EQF;

It seems your method just doesn't lend itself to the sort of testing I can do.

So we come down to the old saying "the proof of the pudding..." which in this case is successful predictions.

You're trying to sell people and governments on the utility of a program without a solid basis of proven success.

That's backwards. Prove it works and getting others to use it will be simple.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF  19:08:48 - 8/7/2004  (22363)  (0)
     ● Re: EQF's prediction program - Don in Hollister  19:06:26 - 8/7/2004  (22362)  (1)
        ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF  19:20:23 - 8/7/2004  (22364)  (2)
           ● EQF's prediction program - Roger Hunter  19:47:25 - 8/7/2004  (22366)  (1)
              ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF  21:57:35 - 8/8/2004  (22383)  (1)
                 ● Re: EQF's prediction program - Don in Hollister  23:19:16 - 8/8/2004  (22389)  (0)
           ● Re: EQF's prediction program - Don in Hollister  19:47:10 - 8/7/2004  (22365)  (1)
              ● Re: EQF's prediction program - chris in suburbia  05:00:46 - 8/8/2004  (22369)  (3)
                 ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF  22:33:30 - 8/8/2004  (22384)  (0)
                 ● not much time on EDG - John Vidale  09:33:06 - 8/8/2004  (22372)  (2)
                    ● And that summarizes the problem - EQF  22:52:34 - 8/8/2004  (22386)  (1)
                       ● name just a single expert that I can call - John Vidale  23:04:20 - 8/8/2004  (22387)  (1)
                          ● Re: name just a single expert that I can call - Don in Hollister  23:55:00 - 8/8/2004  (22390)  (0)
                    ● let me restate that - John Vidale  22:49:32 - 8/8/2004  (22385)  (0)
                 ● You Hit The Nail On The Head - Don in Hollister  07:55:31 - 8/8/2004  (22370)  (1)
                    ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - Cathryn  13:43:09 - 8/9/2004  (22394)  (1)
                       ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - EQF  14:48:02 - 8/9/2004  (22400)  (1)
                          ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - Cathryn  16:18:19 - 8/9/2004  (22401)  (1)
                             ● A past prediction - EQF  16:34:04 - 8/9/2004  (22402)  (8)
                                ● A past prediction - Roger Hunter  21:52:33 - 8/9/2004  (22421)  (0)
                                ● How about your prediction 7 months later? - John Vidale  19:04:02 - 8/9/2004  (22417)  (0)
                                ● How about your prediction 6 months later? - John Vidale  18:58:10 - 8/9/2004  (22415)  (0)
                                ● How about your prediction 3 months earlier? - John Vidale  18:40:51 - 8/9/2004  (22413)  (0)
                                ● How about your prediction 2 months earlier? - John Vidale  18:31:42 - 8/9/2004  (22411)  (2)
                                   ● Re: How about the most recent one? - Don in Hollister  21:08:43 - 8/9/2004  (22419)  (0)
                                   ● Re: How about your prediction 2 months earlier? - Cathryn  18:59:27 - 8/9/2004  (22416)  (0)
                                ● Re: A past prediction - Cathryn  17:14:09 - 8/9/2004  (22405)  (0)
                                ● that prediction missed, and didn't use orbital data - John Vidale  17:03:02 - 8/9/2004  (22404)  (2)
                                   ● Willing to play devil's advocate - Cathryn  17:59:43 - 8/9/2004  (22409)  (0)
                                   ● Re: that prediction missed, and didn't use orbital data - Cathryn  17:36:23 - 8/9/2004  (22406)  (1)
                                      ● google "groups" - John Vidale  17:44:49 - 8/9/2004  (22407)  (1)
                                         ● I meant button, of course (nm) - John Vidale  17:45:51 - 8/9/2004  (22408)  (1)
                                            ● Re: I meant button, of course (nm) - Cathryn  18:38:02 - 8/9/2004  (22412)  (0)
                                ● Re: A past prediction - Cathryn  16:53:10 - 8/9/2004  (22403)  (1)
                                   ● Re: A past prediction - EQF  23:49:03 - 8/9/2004  (22422)  (0)