|
Re: EQF's prediction program |
As the saying goes Don, “You can lead a horse to water. But you can’t make him drink.” I don’t sell earthquake forecasts. And I am not on a glory trip with this effort any more than I was with the efforts I made last year to get the U.S. to get some technology developed to slow the rapid spread of those highly destructive e-mail born computer viruses. These are efforts which are intended to save lives. As I said to another board poster, if you want to talk yourself into believing that my program does not work then considering the fact that you live in earthquake country, the person who is likely to suffer the consequences if you are wrong is you, not me. Also, I am moving the technology along as rapidly as I can. There are certain precautions that need to be taken. In my opinion it is not wise to simply blurt out earthquake predictions which are likely to get people upset. Negative government reactions to the many careless forecasts like that in the past are probably one of the main problems holding back present forecasting efforts. Follow Ups: ● EQF's prediction program - Roger Hunter 19:47:25 - 8/7/2004 (22366) (1) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF 21:57:35 - 8/8/2004 (22383) (1) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - Don in Hollister 23:19:16 - 8/8/2004 (22389) (0) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - Don in Hollister 19:47:10 - 8/7/2004 (22365) (1) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - chris in suburbia 05:00:46 - 8/8/2004 (22369) (3) ● Re: EQF's prediction program - EQF 22:33:30 - 8/8/2004 (22384) (0) ● not much time on EDG - John Vidale 09:33:06 - 8/8/2004 (22372) (2) ● And that summarizes the problem - EQF 22:52:34 - 8/8/2004 (22386) (1) ● name just a single expert that I can call - John Vidale 23:04:20 - 8/8/2004 (22387) (1) ● Re: name just a single expert that I can call - Don in Hollister 23:55:00 - 8/8/2004 (22390) (0) ● let me restate that - John Vidale 22:49:32 - 8/8/2004 (22385) (0) ● You Hit The Nail On The Head - Don in Hollister 07:55:31 - 8/8/2004 (22370) (1) ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - Cathryn 13:43:09 - 8/9/2004 (22394) (1) ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - EQF 14:48:02 - 8/9/2004 (22400) (1) ● Re: You Hit The Nail On The Head - Cathryn 16:18:19 - 8/9/2004 (22401) (1) ● A past prediction - EQF 16:34:04 - 8/9/2004 (22402) (8) ● A past prediction - Roger Hunter 21:52:33 - 8/9/2004 (22421) (0) ● How about your prediction 7 months later? - John Vidale 19:04:02 - 8/9/2004 (22417) (0) ● How about your prediction 6 months later? - John Vidale 18:58:10 - 8/9/2004 (22415) (0) ● How about your prediction 3 months earlier? - John Vidale 18:40:51 - 8/9/2004 (22413) (0) ● How about your prediction 2 months earlier? - John Vidale 18:31:42 - 8/9/2004 (22411) (2) ● Re: How about the most recent one? - Don in Hollister 21:08:43 - 8/9/2004 (22419) (0) ● Re: How about your prediction 2 months earlier? - Cathryn 18:59:27 - 8/9/2004 (22416) (0) ● Re: A past prediction - Cathryn 17:14:09 - 8/9/2004 (22405) (0) ● that prediction missed, and didn't use orbital data - John Vidale 17:03:02 - 8/9/2004 (22404) (2) ● Willing to play devil's advocate - Cathryn 17:59:43 - 8/9/2004 (22409) (0) ● Re: that prediction missed, and didn't use orbital data - Cathryn 17:36:23 - 8/9/2004 (22406) (1) ● google "groups" - John Vidale 17:44:49 - 8/9/2004 (22407) (1) ● I meant button, of course (nm) - John Vidale 17:45:51 - 8/9/2004 (22408) (1) ● Re: I meant button, of course (nm) - Cathryn 18:38:02 - 8/9/2004 (22412) (0) ● Re: A past prediction - Cathryn 16:53:10 - 8/9/2004 (22403) (1) ● Re: A past prediction - EQF 23:49:03 - 8/9/2004 (22422) (0) |
|