Update and Recommendations
Posted by EQF on November 09, 2003 at 10:35:33:

These are personal opinions.

What I believe are probably precursor signals are still being detected. One of the strongest I have detected this year was logged at 2003/11/09 02:18:00 UTC. I believe that this would be 6:18 PM on November 8, 2003 on the U.S. West Coast.

Recommendations:

1. My earthquake time windows and locations are not 100% dependable. And I am recommending that people who are interested in this subject matter try contacting some of their local earthquake precursor data collection groups. Such researchers can often be found at universities etc. Tell them that someone has reported detecting what that person believes were some approaching earthquake related electromagnetic energy field fluctuations on November 7 and 8. Ask them if they have been detecting anything unusual during the past few days. If this possible earthquake is going to occur in some area where people are monitoring precursor signals then I believe that there should be some additional, easily spotted evidence of its approach.

2. Also ask them if you can pass their data along to other people. And if there are any responses, positive or negative and the researchers say that circulating their data is permissible then you might try posting a note here or perhaps sending me a note about it by e-mail. You can try using the e-mail address at the bottom of the following Web page:

http://www.freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/index.html



Follow Ups:
     ● Update - EQF  21:43:14 - 11/9/2003  (20049)  (2)
        ● Update - EQF  20:25:19 - 11/10/2003  (20056)  (3)
           ● Update - "All Clear" circulated - EQF  11:49:24 - 11/17/2003  (20133)  (0)
           ● Re: Update - Don in Hollister  20:55:59 - 11/10/2003  (20059)  (1)
              ● Forecasting approaches - EQF  17:44:04 - 11/11/2003  (20067)  (1)
                 ● Re: Forecasting approaches - Don in Hollister  23:50:00 - 11/11/2003  (20073)  (0)
           ● some clarification? - John Vidale  20:31:51 - 11/10/2003  (20058)  (1)
              ● Latest theories - EQF  17:06:55 - 11/11/2003  (20064)  (2)
                 ● not very convincing - John Vidale  20:01:43 - 11/11/2003  (20071)  (1)
                    ● Come now, get serious - EQF  08:58:50 - 11/12/2003  (20077)  (1)
                       ● a few basics - John Vidale  10:47:50 - 11/12/2003  (20078)  (1)
                          ● Basics indeed! - EQF  12:13:31 - 11/12/2003  (20079)  (1)
                             ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  13:32:02 - 11/12/2003  (20080)  (1)
                                ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  16:56:13 - 11/12/2003  (20084)  (2)
                                   ● challenging Don's credentials? - John Vidale  21:17:31 - 11/12/2003  (20090)  (1)
                                      ● Re: challenging Don's credentials? - EQF  01:26:10 - 11/13/2003  (20095)  (0)
                                   ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  17:29:05 - 11/12/2003  (20085)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  18:11:09 - 11/12/2003  (20087)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  19:17:17 - 11/12/2003  (20089)  (1)
                                            ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  01:22:59 - 11/13/2003  (20094)  (1)
                                               ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  02:46:49 - 11/13/2003  (20098)  (1)
                                                  ● a scientist - chris in suburbia  09:35:54 - 11/13/2003  (20104)  (0)
                 ● Re: Latest theories - Roger Hunter  17:37:55 - 11/11/2003  (20066)  (1)
                    ● Celestial data - EQF  17:59:12 - 11/11/2003  (20068)  (1)
                       ● Re: Celestial data - Roger Hunter  18:18:55 - 11/11/2003  (20069)  (1)
                          ● Re: Celestial data - EQF  19:42:16 - 11/11/2003  (20070)  (0)
        ● Not a good sign - EQF  05:23:20 - 11/10/2003  (20054)  (0)
     ● Forecast credibility - EQF  21:08:03 - 11/9/2003  (20047)  (0)
     ● Thanks - Todd  17:40:53 - 11/9/2003  (20046)  (1)
        ● Re: Thanks - EQF  21:31:33 - 11/9/2003  (20048)  (0)