|
Re: Basics indeed! |
Hi EQF. Every scientist worth his ilk knows he is going to be challenged to prove what he say’s. Why should it be any different with you? Your asking to be able to post what ever you want without being challenged (attacked in your words) is unacceptable. It isn’t done that way. In order for me accept what you say you are going to have to prove it. That means presenting the date, location and magnitude of a quake before the quake occurs. Until as such time you do that you have nothing that is believable. It’s true that you don’t have to prove anything to me, but it’s also true that I don’t have to accept anything you say. I cannot and will not sit quietly by allowing you to post what ever you want without any proof what so ever. If you can’t take the heat then get out of the kitchen. Take Care…Don in creepy town Follow Ups: ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 16:56:13 - 11/12/2003 (20084) (2) ● challenging Don's credentials? - John Vidale 21:17:31 - 11/12/2003 (20090) (1) ● Re: challenging Don's credentials? - EQF 01:26:10 - 11/13/2003 (20095) (0) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 17:29:05 - 11/12/2003 (20085) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 18:11:09 - 11/12/2003 (20087) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 19:17:17 - 11/12/2003 (20089) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 01:22:59 - 11/13/2003 (20094) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 02:46:49 - 11/13/2003 (20098) (1) ● a scientist - chris in suburbia 09:35:54 - 11/13/2003 (20104) (0) |
|