|
not very convincing |
E, As you have a leading role, perhaps you can reveal whom you are leading. As for the claim that no has previously taken into account the positions of the Sun and Moon in tidal studies, uh, that is not quite right. Finally, the great distance of the other planets precludes any significant influence whatsoever on stress in the Earth (reading ahead to your later posts). By the way, my co-author's tidal calculations assume a PREM Earth structure (Google it, if it doesn't sound familiar), which has P, S, and density structure to within a per cent or so throughout the Earth, so it has the liquid outer core and solid inner core, not that it matters. Thanks for answering my questions, however. John Follow Ups: ● Come now, get serious - EQF 08:58:50 - 11/12/2003 (20077) (1) ● a few basics - John Vidale 10:47:50 - 11/12/2003 (20078) (1) ● Basics indeed! - EQF 12:13:31 - 11/12/2003 (20079) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 13:32:02 - 11/12/2003 (20080) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 16:56:13 - 11/12/2003 (20084) (2) ● challenging Don's credentials? - John Vidale 21:17:31 - 11/12/2003 (20090) (1) ● Re: challenging Don's credentials? - EQF 01:26:10 - 11/13/2003 (20095) (0) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 17:29:05 - 11/12/2003 (20085) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 18:11:09 - 11/12/2003 (20087) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 19:17:17 - 11/12/2003 (20089) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 01:22:59 - 11/13/2003 (20094) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 02:46:49 - 11/13/2003 (20098) (1) ● a scientist - chris in suburbia 09:35:54 - 11/13/2003 (20104) (0) |
|