|
Re: Earthquake Research Update November 1, 2010 |
EQF, for your graphs to mean something you would need to plot ALL M6.5 earthquakes that appeared around the world on them: you could work with Roger to exclude aftershocks. The Southern California Earthquake Center has been working for several years with international partners on their Collaboratory for Earthquake Predictability. It's not a secret; abstracts are online and papers get published. We are talking "short-term" prediction. They are only interested in Physics-based schemes that can be evaluated. You, and others here, probably have not heard much from this because (although I could be wrong), there has not been success. Shan's does not make logical sense that it could work. I probably don't know enough about your EM signals, but as you have been hearing from me, I have strong doubts. Chris Follow Ups: ● Re: Earthquake Research Update November 1, 2010 - EQF 15:30:22 - 11/1/2010 (77702) (1) ● Re: Earthquake Research Update November 1, 2010 - heartland chris 17:38:36 - 11/1/2010 (77703) (2) ● Re: Earthquake Research Update November 1, 2010 - EQF 09:08:04 - 11/2/2010 (77705) (1) ● Re: Earthquake Research Update November 1, 2010 - Roger Hunter 10:11:39 - 11/2/2010 (77706) (1) ● Re: Earthquake Research Update November 1, 2010 - EQF 02:06:53 - 11/3/2010 (77708) (2) ● Physics-based earthquake research need not be expensive - heartland chris 06:30:44 - 11/3/2010 (77710) (2) ● Re: Physics-based earthquake research need not be expensive - EQF 22:48:04 - 11/3/2010 (77717) (2) ● Re: Physics-based earthquake research need not be expensive - Roger Hunter 08:30:11 - 11/4/2010 (77720) (0) ● Re: Physics-based earthquake research need not be expensive - heartland chris 06:40:25 - 11/4/2010 (77719) (1) ● Re: Physics-based earthquake research need not be expensive - EQF 04:45:08 - 11/5/2010 (77725) (1) ● Re: Physics-based earthquake research need not be expensive - heartland chris 09:20:45 - 11/7/2010 (77749) (1) ● Re: Physics-based earthquake research need not be expensive - Skywise 13:29:36 - 11/7/2010 (77751) (0) ● Seismometers are predicting earthquakes....!need not be expensive - Shan 09:56:29 - 11/3/2010 (77711) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are predicting earthquakes....!need not be expensive - heartland chris 19:06:26 - 11/3/2010 (77715) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are predicting earthquakes....! - Shan 20:23:28 - 11/3/2010 (77716) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - heartland chris 06:31:48 - 11/4/2010 (77718) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Shan 12:03:11 - 11/4/2010 (77721) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 16:55:48 - 11/4/2010 (77722) (2) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Shan 05:34:40 - 11/5/2010 (77726) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 09:07:22 - 11/5/2010 (77727) (0) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - EQF 03:42:42 - 11/5/2010 (77723) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 09:12:17 - 11/5/2010 (77728) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Shan 11:12:29 - 11/5/2010 (77729) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 11:42:49 - 11/5/2010 (77731) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Shan 18:32:13 - 11/5/2010 (77736) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 19:15:56 - 11/5/2010 (77737) (2) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - EQF 10:43:28 - 11/6/2010 (77740) (2) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Skywise 12:37:01 - 11/6/2010 (77742) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 20:58:19 - 11/6/2010 (77744) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - EQF 22:36:25 - 11/6/2010 (77746) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 06:49:49 - 11/7/2010 (77748) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - EQF 22:46:26 - 11/8/2010 (77760) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 08:16:41 - 11/9/2010 (77762) (0) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 11:38:45 - 11/6/2010 (77741) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Shan 20:46:18 - 11/6/2010 (77743) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Roger Hunter 21:01:23 - 11/6/2010 (77745) (1) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Shan 04:08:56 - 11/7/2010 (77747) (0) ● Re: Seismometers are not predicting earthquakes. - Shan 06:35:33 - 11/6/2010 (77739) (0) ● Lowell Whiteside - heartland chris 06:18:05 - 11/3/2010 (77709) (0) ● Re: Earthquake Research Update November 1, 2010 - Roger Hunter 18:55:51 - 11/1/2010 (77704) (0) |
|