|
serious but probably not well-founded |
EDF, I'd like their method to work. However, it is hard to take seriously a scheme that claims to identify days to months in advance individual earthquakes as small as magnitude 2's. Individual 3.5's are claimed to be predicted all around the world. The scoring is also quirky, unpredicted events are not penalized, events only need to be with 100-200 km of the prediction, and missing by 4 magnitude units (calling for a 3.5 and getting a 7.5, for instance) can still result in a nearly perfect score. The only way to judge their efforts is when they show what their predictions were in detail for the test period, or better still when they predict some future events. We'll know soon. John Follow Ups: ● Re: Let Us Have A Positive Thought - Petra Challus 22:49:11 - 2/17/2003 (18050) (1) ● Claimed to be ready for prime time - John Vidale 06:44:29 - 2/18/2003 (18053) (2) ● Re: My Oh My - Aren't We Open Minded - Petra Challus 19:08:56 - 2/18/2003 (18061) (1) ● cold facts aren't always friendly - John Vidale 19:49:19 - 2/18/2003 (18062) (2) ● Re: cold facts aren't always friendly - Petra Challus 20:34:13 - 2/18/2003 (18064) (1) ● different approaches - John Vidale 21:25:09 - 2/18/2003 (18067) (1) ● Re: different approaches - Petra Challus 22:38:35 - 2/18/2003 (18068) (1) ● practicality - John Vidale 23:18:14 - 2/18/2003 (18069) (1) ● Re: practicality - Canie 12:04:37 - 2/19/2003 (18080) (1) ● Geoforecaster - chris in suburbia 13:44:56 - 2/20/2003 (18088) (1) ● correlations - John Vidale 14:48:32 - 2/20/2003 (18089) (2) ● Re: Scoring - Canie 23:00:41 - 2/20/2003 (18092) (1) ● automatic hits from loose scoring - John Vidale 06:38:58 - 2/21/2003 (18096) (0) ● I meant only geoF, not Don's work - John Vidale 15:11:31 - 2/20/2003 (18090) (1) ● Re: I meant only geoF, not Don's work - EQF 22:40:17 - 2/20/2003 (18091) (0) ● Re: cold facts aren't always friendly - Don in Hollister 19:56:53 - 2/18/2003 (18063) (1) ● facts are useful - John Vidale 20:40:41 - 2/18/2003 (18065) (0) ● Re: Claimed to be ready for prime time - chris in suburbia 06:57:18 - 2/18/2003 (18055) (1) ● must be Don, not me - John Vidale 07:11:12 - 2/18/2003 (18056) (2) ● Re: must be Don, not me - chris in suburbia 11:48:41 - 2/18/2003 (18060) (0) ● Re: must be Don, not me - Canie 10:49:59 - 2/18/2003 (18059) (1) ● Re: must be Don, not me - Mary C. 09:18:55 - 2/19/2003 (18073) (0) |
|