practicality
Posted by John Vidale on February 18, 2003 at 23:18:14:

Petra,

You may be right that all the evidence is in the archives,
or I may be right that the postings are too loose to definitively evaluate or may fail to support the claims.

One last difference of opinion - I don't mind the approach of geoForecasters, whatever it is, I just doubt it works and am frustrated it is asserted to work, kept a secret, and clouded in dubious statistics.

We do seem to have a common goal, attempting to
predict earthquakes, the possibility of which is still an open question.

John


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: practicality - Canie  12:04:37 - 2/19/2003  (18080)  (1)
        ● Geoforecaster - chris in suburbia  13:44:56 - 2/20/2003  (18088)  (1)
           ● correlations - John Vidale  14:48:32 - 2/20/2003  (18089)  (2)
              ● Re: Scoring - Canie  23:00:41 - 2/20/2003  (18092)  (1)
                 ● automatic hits from loose scoring - John Vidale  06:38:58 - 2/21/2003  (18096)  (0)
              ● I meant only geoF, not Don's work - John Vidale  15:11:31 - 2/20/2003  (18090)  (1)
                 ● Re: I meant only geoF, not Don's work - EQF  22:40:17 - 2/20/2003  (18091)  (0)