John-Don, correct me if I am wrong, but I understand that you were using their data to make predictions on this page. And, that Lowell evaluated your predictions, and gave them a very high score. But, that this did not seem like an independent evaluation to me, although I may be wrong. I could not evaluate a lot of the predictions for very small events (high 2s and low 3s) myself because I only casually look at seismicity (as a hobby), and it is hard to judge significance without doing it methodically. There was the M4.9 south of the Bay area-it was a hit on revised date, about 100 km or more too far south, and smaller than predicted, but interesting none-the less. I was hoping that Roger would do an independent evaluation of all those predictions on this page. Maybe John would want to......

Chris