|
Geoforecaster |
John, as Canie pointed out, the forecasts by Don are in the archives and can be evaluated. It is not a simple thing to evaluate, and I'm not going to do it. I think that Roger Hunter may know Lowell pretty well, at least by email, but I would judge Roger independent-he is retired USGS seismologist. He may already have an opinion of the predictions. Hang around this page for a while-there are some interesting things dicussed once in a while. Some of the correlations may be weak, but if they exist at all, then they are interesting. These are-solar or geomagnetic storm triggering, Far field aftershocks, .....-I think these ideas were originally discussed on this site by Lowell Whiteside. I'm a research scientist who publishes on active faults, but as far as earthquake prediction I am an amateur and posting on this page is a hobby. I am also an old friend of Lowell's, although he may be annoyed at me for my skepticism. I actually think that Geoforecaster may be a good thing in that it may raise some interesting discussions. Follow Ups: ● correlations - John Vidale 14:48:32 - 2/20/2003 (18089) (2) ● Re: Scoring - Canie 23:00:41 - 2/20/2003 (18092) (1) ● automatic hits from loose scoring - John Vidale 06:38:58 - 2/21/2003 (18096) (0) ● I meant only geoF, not Don's work - John Vidale 15:11:31 - 2/20/2003 (18090) (1) ● Re: I meant only geoF, not Don's work - EQF 22:40:17 - 2/20/2003 (18091) (0) |
|