Re: A hit is a hit ...
Posted by Roger Hunter on March 12, 2001 at 10:53:08:

Michael;

maybe this will help.

I've written a new program which will find best-fitting quakes. It takes a center point, radius, date and mag. range and finds 3 quakes; the closest one in time, the closest one in space and the biggest one around.

It's currently set to double the radius, an extra day on each end and 1/2 unit of mag. on each end. These determine the search parameters.

I'd like suggestions on those parameters; too big, too small, what do you think? And which one is the best fit; closest in space, time or largest? Or would you want to see all 3?

This is a tool to help refine your method. Probability will be determined by where the hits actually fall in the ranges.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Definitions - michael  14:59:31 - 3/12/2001  (5979)  (2)
        ● Re: Definitions - Roger Hunter  16:09:14 - 3/12/2001  (5983)  (0)
        ● Re: Definitions - David  15:40:52 - 3/12/2001  (5981)  (1)
           ● Comments - michael  15:58:37 - 3/12/2001  (5982)  (1)
              ● Re: Comments - David  16:13:22 - 3/12/2001  (5984)  (1)
                 ● Comments - michael  20:34:18 - 3/12/2001  (5986)  (2)
                    ● Where did you go? - David  02:06:07 - 3/14/2001  (6005)  (0)
                    ● Re: Comments - David  22:55:29 - 3/12/2001  (5987)  (1)
                       ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  05:12:02 - 3/13/2001  (5989)  (1)
                          ● Re: Comments - David  07:21:46 - 3/13/2001  (5990)  (1)
                             ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  10:45:47 - 3/13/2001  (5991)  (1)
                                ● Re: Comments - David  14:48:37 - 3/13/2001  (5995)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  16:15:37 - 3/13/2001  (5996)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Comments - David  18:04:07 - 3/13/2001  (5997)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  19:47:41 - 3/13/2001  (5998)  (1)
                                            ● Re: Comments - David  23:43:42 - 3/13/2001  (6002)  (1)
                                               ● Re: Comments - David  23:58:09 - 3/13/2001  (6003)  (1)
                                                  ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  16:22:19 - 3/14/2001  (6007)  (1)
                                                     ● Re: Comments - David  02:39:05 - 3/15/2001  (6009)  (1)
                                                        ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  05:31:38 - 3/15/2001  (6011)  (1)
                                                           ● Re: Comments - David  06:52:52 - 3/15/2001  (6012)  (0)