|
Re: A hit is a hit ... |
Michael; maybe this will help. I've written a new program which will find best-fitting quakes. It takes a center point, radius, date and mag. range and finds 3 quakes; the closest one in time, the closest one in space and the biggest one around. It's currently set to double the radius, an extra day on each end and 1/2 unit of mag. on each end. These determine the search parameters. I'd like suggestions on those parameters; too big, too small, what do you think? And which one is the best fit; closest in space, time or largest? Or would you want to see all 3? This is a tool to help refine your method. Probability will be determined by where the hits actually fall in the ranges. Roger Follow Ups: ● Definitions - michael 14:59:31 - 3/12/2001 (5979) (2) ● Re: Definitions - Roger Hunter 16:09:14 - 3/12/2001 (5983) (0) ● Re: Definitions - David 15:40:52 - 3/12/2001 (5981) (1) ● Comments - michael 15:58:37 - 3/12/2001 (5982) (1) ● Re: Comments - David 16:13:22 - 3/12/2001 (5984) (1) ● Comments - michael 20:34:18 - 3/12/2001 (5986) (2) ● Where did you go? - David 02:06:07 - 3/14/2001 (6005) (0) ● Re: Comments - David 22:55:29 - 3/12/2001 (5987) (1) ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter 05:12:02 - 3/13/2001 (5989) (1) ● Re: Comments - David 07:21:46 - 3/13/2001 (5990) (1) ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter 10:45:47 - 3/13/2001 (5991) (1) ● Re: Comments - David 14:48:37 - 3/13/2001 (5995) (1) ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter 16:15:37 - 3/13/2001 (5996) (1) ● Re: Comments - David 18:04:07 - 3/13/2001 (5997) (1) ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter 19:47:41 - 3/13/2001 (5998) (1) ● Re: Comments - David 23:43:42 - 3/13/2001 (6002) (1) ● Re: Comments - David 23:58:09 - 3/13/2001 (6003) (1) ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter 16:22:19 - 3/14/2001 (6007) (1) ● Re: Comments - David 02:39:05 - 3/15/2001 (6009) (1) ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter 05:31:38 - 3/15/2001 (6011) (1) ● Re: Comments - David 06:52:52 - 3/15/2001 (6012) (0) |
|