Comments
Posted by michael on March 12, 2001 at 15:58:37:

Hi David and welcome.

Your comments are much apprectiated.

Leeway is something this scientific oriented mind would like to ignore, as it is subjective. I think comparison to random chance is rather useless for an individual event, I feel it would be quite usefull over the long run for a given predictor.

Prediction is not an exact science, as we well know. But, if we are to begin learning about possible routes to reliable predictions, I thing we are going to have to look for subtle clues in all the noise. The way, in my opion, to do that is to look for subtle trends over time, in a
quantitaive manner.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Comments - David  16:13:22 - 3/12/2001  (5984)  (1)
        ● Comments - michael  20:34:18 - 3/12/2001  (5986)  (2)
           ● Where did you go? - David  02:06:07 - 3/14/2001  (6005)  (0)
           ● Re: Comments - David  22:55:29 - 3/12/2001  (5987)  (1)
              ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  05:12:02 - 3/13/2001  (5989)  (1)
                 ● Re: Comments - David  07:21:46 - 3/13/2001  (5990)  (1)
                    ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  10:45:47 - 3/13/2001  (5991)  (1)
                       ● Re: Comments - David  14:48:37 - 3/13/2001  (5995)  (1)
                          ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  16:15:37 - 3/13/2001  (5996)  (1)
                             ● Re: Comments - David  18:04:07 - 3/13/2001  (5997)  (1)
                                ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  19:47:41 - 3/13/2001  (5998)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Comments - David  23:43:42 - 3/13/2001  (6002)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Comments - David  23:58:09 - 3/13/2001  (6003)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  16:22:19 - 3/14/2001  (6007)  (1)
                                            ● Re: Comments - David  02:39:05 - 3/15/2001  (6009)  (1)
                                               ● Re: Comments - Roger Hunter  05:31:38 - 3/15/2001  (6011)  (1)
                                                  ● Re: Comments - David  06:52:52 - 3/15/2001  (6012)  (0)