John? Petra's Mogi Donut
Posted by chris in suburbia on May 04, 2006 at 04:32:42:

John, take a look at this...looks like Petra caught one....comments? I'm talking about the donut as saying something about the earthquake process, not whether or not it was an accurate prediction...
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● No donuts for me - John Vidale  21:06:03 - 5/4/2006  (36777)  (3)
        ● John...not really what I was asking - chris in suburbia  15:56:55 - 5/5/2006  (36798)  (1)
           ● what pattern? - John Vidale  16:38:58 - 5/5/2006  (36800)  (1)
              ● Re: what pattern? - chris in suburbia  05:31:12 - 5/6/2006  (36810)  (1)
                 ● seismicity in 2006 - chris in suburbia  05:36:31 - 5/6/2006  (36811)  (1)
                    ● 10 days vs 40 days? - John Vidale  07:41:50 - 5/6/2006  (36816)  (1)
                       ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Petra  16:04:52 - 5/6/2006  (36822)  (2)
                          ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:31:24 - 5/7/2006  (36834)  (1)
                             ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Petra  12:45:28 - 5/7/2006  (36842)  (0)
                          ● didn't you say 10 days? - John Vidale  20:06:38 - 5/6/2006  (36827)  (1)
                             ● Re: didn't you say 10 days? - Canie  10:40:26 - 5/7/2006  (36838)  (0)
        ● Re: No donuts for me - Winchells Are The Best  - Petra  22:30:57 - 5/4/2006  (36781)  (1)
           ● some leads - John Vidale  23:16:27 - 5/4/2006  (36782)  (1)
              ● Re: some leads - Petra  04:07:30 - 5/7/2006  (36831)  (4)
                 ● Re: some leads - Canie  12:48:33 - 5/7/2006  (36843)  (1)
                    ● It's The Driver - Don in Hollister  14:33:44 - 5/7/2006  (36845)  (1)
                       ● Re: It's The Driver - Cathryn  15:21:30 - 5/12/2006  (36903)  (0)
                 ● Re: some leads - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:53:01 - 5/7/2006  (36837)  (0)
                 ● once again - John Vidale  07:32:15 - 5/7/2006  (36835)  (1)
                    ● Re: once again WITH FLAVOR - Petra  12:12:48 - 5/7/2006  (36839)  (2)
                       ● I'm not the unhappy one here - John Vidale  15:15:12 - 5/7/2006  (36846)  (0)
                       ● She's right you know.... - Russell  12:32:25 - 5/7/2006  (36841)  (1)
                          ● Re: She's right you know.... - Petra  21:51:26 - 5/7/2006  (36850)  (1)
                             ● Re: She's right you know.... - Russell  06:13:23 - 5/8/2006  (36855)  (0)
                 ● Re: some leads - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:00:54 - 5/7/2006  (36833)  (0)
        ● Let's Talk FFA Theory - Petra  22:17:13 - 5/4/2006  (36780)  (1)
           ● why would FFA work? - John Vidale  23:23:40 - 5/4/2006  (36783)  (1)
              ● Re: why would FFA work? - Petra  00:42:41 - 5/6/2006  (36809)  (1)
                 ● ?? - John Vidale  07:29:30 - 5/6/2006  (36815)  (1)
                    ● Re: ?? Did You Ask? - Petra  16:15:46 - 5/6/2006  (36823)  (1)
                       ● again, I ask why? - John Vidale  20:09:05 - 5/6/2006  (36828)  (1)
                          ● Re: again, I ask why? - Petra  12:29:53 - 5/7/2006  (36840)  (1)
                             ● No answer, you've given up? - John Vidale  15:18:47 - 5/7/2006  (36847)  (1)
                                ● Re: No answer, you've given up? - Canie  21:06:35 - 5/7/2006  (36848)  (1)
                                   ● wasn't threatening to disappear - John Vidale  21:15:52 - 5/7/2006  (36849)  (2)
                                      ● Re: wasn't threatening to disappear - Canie  12:46:38 - 5/8/2006  (36857)  (0)
                                      ● Re: wasn't threatening to disappear - Petra  01:29:17 - 5/8/2006  (36853)  (2)
                                         ● Re: stolen data - Canie  12:57:27 - 5/8/2006  (36858)  (1)
                                            ● Today I Have The Evidence - Petra  16:20:41 - 5/8/2006  (36861)  (0)
                                         ● Is this about why 103 rings would work? - John Vidale  08:08:44 - 5/8/2006  (36856)  (0)
     ● A Note Chris - Petra  12:16:43 - 5/4/2006  (36763)  (0)