No donuts for me
Posted by John Vidale on May 04, 2006 at 21:06:03:

I was out in the Mojave, setting up a seismic experiment for a few days. As Petra knows, I'm not a fan of Mogi donuts. The idea has been around for decades without surviving any rigorous tests, it has only slightly more credentials with me than the P-diffraction (103 degree) circles, i.e., none.

Follow Ups:
     ● John...not really what I was asking - chris in suburbia  15:56:55 - 5/5/2006  (36798)  (1)
        ● what pattern? - John Vidale  16:38:58 - 5/5/2006  (36800)  (1)
           ● Re: what pattern? - chris in suburbia  05:31:12 - 5/6/2006  (36810)  (1)
              ● seismicity in 2006 - chris in suburbia  05:36:31 - 5/6/2006  (36811)  (1)
                 ● 10 days vs 40 days? - John Vidale  07:41:50 - 5/6/2006  (36816)  (1)
                    ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Petra  16:04:52 - 5/6/2006  (36822)  (2)
                       ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:31:24 - 5/7/2006  (36834)  (1)
                          ● Re: 10 days vs 40 days? More To Understand - Petra  12:45:28 - 5/7/2006  (36842)  (0)
                       ● didn't you say 10 days? - John Vidale  20:06:38 - 5/6/2006  (36827)  (1)
                          ● Re: didn't you say 10 days? - Canie  10:40:26 - 5/7/2006  (36838)  (0)
     ● Re: No donuts for me - Winchells Are The Best  - Petra  22:30:57 - 5/4/2006  (36781)  (1)
        ● some leads - John Vidale  23:16:27 - 5/4/2006  (36782)  (1)
           ● Re: some leads - Petra  04:07:30 - 5/7/2006  (36831)  (4)
              ● Re: some leads - Canie  12:48:33 - 5/7/2006  (36843)  (1)
                 ● It's The Driver - Don in Hollister  14:33:44 - 5/7/2006  (36845)  (1)
                    ● Re: It's The Driver - Cathryn  15:21:30 - 5/12/2006  (36903)  (0)
              ● Re: some leads - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:53:01 - 5/7/2006  (36837)  (0)
              ● once again - John Vidale  07:32:15 - 5/7/2006  (36835)  (1)
                 ● Re: once again WITH FLAVOR - Petra  12:12:48 - 5/7/2006  (36839)  (2)
                    ● I'm not the unhappy one here - John Vidale  15:15:12 - 5/7/2006  (36846)  (0)
                    ● She's right you know.... - Russell  12:32:25 - 5/7/2006  (36841)  (1)
                       ● Re: She's right you know.... - Petra  21:51:26 - 5/7/2006  (36850)  (1)
                          ● Re: She's right you know.... - Russell  06:13:23 - 5/8/2006  (36855)  (0)
              ● Re: some leads - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:00:54 - 5/7/2006  (36833)  (0)
     ● Let's Talk FFA Theory - Petra  22:17:13 - 5/4/2006  (36780)  (1)
        ● why would FFA work? - John Vidale  23:23:40 - 5/4/2006  (36783)  (1)
           ● Re: why would FFA work? - Petra  00:42:41 - 5/6/2006  (36809)  (1)
              ● ?? - John Vidale  07:29:30 - 5/6/2006  (36815)  (1)
                 ● Re: ?? Did You Ask? - Petra  16:15:46 - 5/6/2006  (36823)  (1)
                    ● again, I ask why? - John Vidale  20:09:05 - 5/6/2006  (36828)  (1)
                       ● Re: again, I ask why? - Petra  12:29:53 - 5/7/2006  (36840)  (1)
                          ● No answer, you've given up? - John Vidale  15:18:47 - 5/7/2006  (36847)  (1)
                             ● Re: No answer, you've given up? - Canie  21:06:35 - 5/7/2006  (36848)  (1)
                                ● wasn't threatening to disappear - John Vidale  21:15:52 - 5/7/2006  (36849)  (2)
                                   ● Re: wasn't threatening to disappear - Canie  12:46:38 - 5/8/2006  (36857)  (0)
                                   ● Re: wasn't threatening to disappear - Petra  01:29:17 - 5/8/2006  (36853)  (2)
                                      ● Re: stolen data - Canie  12:57:27 - 5/8/2006  (36858)  (1)
                                         ● Today I Have The Evidence - Petra  16:20:41 - 5/8/2006  (36861)  (0)
                                      ● Is this about why 103 rings would work? - John Vidale  08:08:44 - 5/8/2006  (36856)  (0)