why would FFA work?
Posted by John Vidale on May 04, 2006 at 23:23:40:

Roger, Chris and I charted many decades data a while back, and it was clear the data did not support the theory. But more basically, why would earthquakes be preferentially triggered at 103 degrees distance?

Logic like this: "The 7.6 in Koryakia, Russian triggered Atacama, Chile. Atacama Chile triggered Tonga." is weak when we can do and did a much more sensitive test with all the earthquakes.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: why would FFA work? - Petra  00:42:41 - 5/6/2006  (36809)  (1)
        ● ?? - John Vidale  07:29:30 - 5/6/2006  (36815)  (1)
           ● Re: ?? Did You Ask? - Petra  16:15:46 - 5/6/2006  (36823)  (1)
              ● again, I ask why? - John Vidale  20:09:05 - 5/6/2006  (36828)  (1)
                 ● Re: again, I ask why? - Petra  12:29:53 - 5/7/2006  (36840)  (1)
                    ● No answer, you've given up? - John Vidale  15:18:47 - 5/7/2006  (36847)  (1)
                       ● Re: No answer, you've given up? - Canie  21:06:35 - 5/7/2006  (36848)  (1)
                          ● wasn't threatening to disappear - John Vidale  21:15:52 - 5/7/2006  (36849)  (2)
                             ● Re: wasn't threatening to disappear - Canie  12:46:38 - 5/8/2006  (36857)  (0)
                             ● Re: wasn't threatening to disappear - Petra  01:29:17 - 5/8/2006  (36853)  (2)
                                ● Re: stolen data - Canie  12:57:27 - 5/8/2006  (36858)  (1)
                                   ● Today I Have The Evidence - Petra  16:20:41 - 5/8/2006  (36861)  (0)
                                ● Is this about why 103 rings would work? - John Vidale  08:08:44 - 5/8/2006  (36856)  (0)