John,

This post will demonstrate that there is a sound which comes from Parkfield and Chalome and it's not just a one time or two time event. It happens and more people than myself have heard it. (For ease of these reports, they are listed individually, so please scoll down for all of the details.) I have excluded the 6.0 quake from this report as we have hashed that over several times and everyone knows it exists in the archives. This report will only address three smaller events as I think for demonstration purposes, this is of better quality and comparison.

In example #1 - This is post #25343 and the original prediction was post #25176. While this is a no hitter insofar as prediction goes, a quake did arrive, it was the correct place, only 3.2 miles away from the predicted epicenter and it was in the correct magnitude range.

Chalome Did Chatter
Posted by Petra on March 25, 2005 at 21:55:57:
Hi All,

I see Chalome decided to chatter after all and not far from my predicted epicenter. The results from the distance calculator showed 3.2 miles as you can see below. While this one remains a no hitter due to falling after the window presented, it is as close to "exactly" where it belongs and the correct magnitude range as well.

This place is in the Chalome Hills, not in the aftershock zone of the Parkfield event....Petra

== PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE REPORT ==

California Integrated Seismic Net
USGS/ Caltech/ CGS/ UCB/ UCSD/ UNR
Version #2: This report supersedes any earlier reports of this event.
This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
A minor earthquake occurred at 8:36:48 PM (PST) on Friday, March 25, 2005.
The magnitude 3.6 event occurred 8 km (5 miles) SSE of Parkfield, CA.

Example #2 - Research Group Reports

3.4 Parkfield Earthquake 4/16/05

Subject M#1 reported on 4/3 a 3 second right tone with volume 2/5, distance from subject to the quake location 133 miles which afford this subject 3.54 seconds of ear tone.

Subject Cathryn reported on 3/30 a 2 second right tone with volume 3/5 (she was closer than subject M#1) Distance 110 miles which afforded her 2.93 seconds of ear tone.
(Note: We all are given 37.5 mile radius on shorter tones and more on longer ones as we have to make allowances for counting.)

Example #3

3.1 Parkfield Earthquake 5/9/05

Subject A#1 reported on 4/25/05 a 4 second left tone, volume 4/5 (subject is in SoCal), a very high, loudish tone, no ear shut off, just there and gone. The subject was 196 miles away and needed 5.22 second to hit this target so the subject was a little off, but no other earthquakes occurred to match this report.

Subject M#2 reported on 5/3/05 a 8/9 second left tone, volume 1.5-2/5 (also in Socal, but far from subject A#1) This subject was 286 miles away affording 7.62 seconds of ear tone.

In Conclusion:

These submissions are but a small example of documenting the ongoing research program. There are some better examples and certainly some worse, but there is absolutely no instrument developed yet, that I am aware of which can isolate these sounds and uniformly match them with earthquake epicenters.

I am very sorry that the instruments in Parkfield did not record some type of precursory phenomena; but this demonstration should be saying to everyone that there is something more; something yet to be developed and something that can work in the future.

The failure of anyone to see this only leads me to conclude that some people don't want answers or solutions. The evidence speaks for itself.

Petra