One of the first red flags to a scientist is someone whose certainty has outrun their evidence.

I'm still waiting to hear:

(1) a plausible explanation for why your ears detect a signal that travels kms per sec, which scientific instruments cannot.

And (2) why the place a large earthquake is about to strike would generate such a signal.

And (3) why such a signal would not be generated anywhere else.

An explanation consistent with the lack of even the smallest earthquakes from the nucleation region (and the best seismic network in the world surrounds Parkfield), no detectable precursory deformation, and no detectable EM radiation, either.

Infrasound? Are you serious? Rocks breaking? That we understand very, very well. What do you think you're hearing?

I'm not saying that I'm sure you're wrong, but that you've not yet built much of a case, and I don't buy it.