maybe I wasn't clear
Posted by John Vidale on December 04, 2005 at 10:55:09:

The two abstracts document beyond question that the Parkfield mainshock did not show anomalous EM precursors, in particular of the flavor claimed to have been recorded for the Loma Prieta earthquake.

If ear tones are claimed to arise from something other than vibrations or this frequency band of electromagnetic waves, which have been ruled out as short-term precursors to the Parkfield earthquake with instruments far, far more sensitive than the human ear, perhaps you could be more specific. Karma? Telepathy? Planetary alignment? What have you in mind?


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: maybe I wasn't clear - Don in Hollister  11:53:04 - 12/4/2005  (31463)  (1)
        ● Petra/Don, you and John are - Roger Hunter  13:34:31 - 12/4/2005  (31469)  (0)
     ● Re: maybe I wasn't clear, Oh I think you were. - Petra  11:47:49 - 12/4/2005  (31462)  (1)
        ● misgivings - John Vidale  12:12:25 - 12/4/2005  (31464)  (2)
           ● Re: misgivings - Petra  13:01:19 - 12/4/2005  (31468)  (1)
              ● a plausible explanation? - John Vidale  19:42:27 - 12/4/2005  (31504)  (1)
                 ● Re: a plausible explanation? Infrasound? - Petra  20:40:41 - 12/4/2005  (31506)  (1)
                    ● infrasound is just long-period sound - John Vidale  21:39:48 - 12/4/2005  (31511)  (1)
                       ● Re: infrasound is just long-period sound - Petra  23:11:14 - 12/4/2005  (31516)  (0)
           ● Re: misgivings - Don in Hollister  12:43:42 - 12/4/2005  (31467)  (1)
              ● Re: misgivings - chris in suburbia  15:19:10 - 12/4/2005  (31474)  (1)
                 ● Re: misgivings, hopefully none. - Petra  18:47:26 - 12/4/2005  (31502)  (2)
                    ● research dollars - chris in suburbia  04:12:39 - 12/5/2005  (31518)  (1)
                       ● Re: research dollars/no comment - Petra  04:58:27 - 12/5/2005  (31521)  (1)
                          ● ??? (NT) - Cathryn  17:41:44 - 12/5/2005  (31566)  (0)
                    ● For Petra/Curious to know - Todd  20:29:21 - 12/4/2005  (31505)  (2)
                       ● Re: For Petra/Curious to know - Cathryn  16:14:05 - 12/5/2005  (31562)  (0)
                       ● Re: For Petra/Curious to know - Petra  20:44:26 - 12/4/2005  (31507)  (1)
                          ● Re: For Petra/Curious to know - Cathryn  17:46:05 - 12/5/2005  (31568)  (0)