|
Statistics |
If you go about half way down that 90-03.html Web page you will find a drawing which has the sun on the right and the Earth on the left surrounded by black globes. The globes represent the position of the moon relative to the sun when the 17 most recent powerful earthquakes had occurred when the drawing was made. And the two paragraphs following the drawing state: Those 17 high magnitude earthquakes occurred when the differences between the longitude lines which the sun and the moon were directly above at those times were the following: 40E, 25E, 12E, 10E, 9E, 4E, 19W, 27W, 33W, 35W and 89W, 126W, 161E, 120E, 118E, 94E, 79E. In each case the moon longitude was that many degrees to the east or west of the sun longitude. As it says, 60% of the earthquakes occurred within 20% of the longitude range. That looks like a pretty impressive statistic to me! If I updated that drawing with the latest very powerful earthquakes it would provide even stronger evidence of that preferential triggering. For example, that extremely powerful September 25, 2003 earthquake in Japan occurred when the sun and moon were just 5 degrees apart in the sky. Follow Ups: ● Responses Important question answered Workshop needed - EQF 22:26:37 - 11/22/2003 (20241) (2) ● Re: Responses Important question answered Workshop needed - chris in suburbia 13:33:36 - 11/23/2003 (20248) (1) ● Re: Responses Important question answered Workshop needed - EQF 18:15:38 - 11/23/2003 (20257) (1) ● electron storm - chris in suburbia 08:37:52 - 11/24/2003 (20263) (1) ● Re: electron storm - EQF 18:29:35 - 11/24/2003 (20269) (0) ● out of patience - John Vidale 06:34:01 - 11/23/2003 (20246) (1) ● Re: out of patience - EQF 18:18:22 - 11/23/2003 (20258) (0) ● Re: Statistics - Don in Hollister 08:46:30 - 11/22/2003 (20223) (1) ● Expected earthquake(s) - EQF 22:59:16 - 11/22/2003 (20244) (0) ● some well-known math and physics - John Vidale 07:24:01 - 11/22/2003 (20221) (0) ● Re: Statistics - Roger Hunter 06:30:22 - 11/22/2003 (20219) (0) ● Re: Statistics - chris in suburbia 05:45:07 - 11/22/2003 (20217) (1) ● oops - chris in suburbia 06:52:18 - 11/22/2003 (20220) (1) ● Re: oops - Canie 10:17:01 - 11/22/2003 (20224) (1) ● that's the one - chris in suburbia 16:50:33 - 11/22/2003 (20228) (0) |
|