E

You just don't get it. It is not like this:

"The routines that I use to process my precursor data are 10 to 100 times more complex with regards to the concepts behind them ..."

"I would present a talk on the subject matter and then sit there for a day and answer questions."

In fact, people all over the world have measured the strain in the Earth, calculated the gravitational and electromagnetic fields, and monitored earthquakes in more detail and with greater understanding than you. If you also can't produce nor understand a simple two-sigma test of significance, you are out on a limb claiming to have left everyone else in the dust.

Personally, I can tell you from looking at tens of thousands of earthquakes, as well as from reading the hundreds of studies done over the last 100 years, that the Sun and Moon angles are not strongly related to the timing of earthquakes. It is not clear to me that you comprehend anyone else's work.

The remark about nuclear tests (!?) in your last post is particularly obtuse and wrong. Even a 10 Megaton explosion is dwarfed in power by a large earthquake.

Good luck, but expect no more feedback from me.

John