|
|
|
|
| Re: Note from a local seismologist in So. California |
Somehow this explanation didn't help my nerves any.... We did make another supply run yesterday and my project today is to rotate and organize current supplies on hand. Canie Follow Ups: ● Re: Note from a local seismologist in So. California - Lowell 09:05:20 - 10/30/2001 (10486) (2) ● Re: Note from a local seismologist in So. California - 2cents 09:57:41 - 10/30/2001 (10492) (1) ● Comparing a "random" prediction with a "good" prediction - Lowell 12:37:37 - 10/30/2001 (10495) (2) ● Re: Comparing a "random" prediction with a "good" prediction - 2cents 00:38:18 - 10/31/2001 (10518) (1) ● Re: Comparing a "random" prediction with a "good" prediction - Lowell 06:57:14 - 10/31/2001 (10521) (1) ● Re: Comparing a "random" prediction with a "good" prediction - 2cents 14:22:22 - 10/31/2001 (10547) (1) ● Re: water consumption - Canie 08:55:44 - 11/1/2001 (10566) (1) ● Re: water consumption - 2cents 23:21:01 - 11/1/2001 (10589) (1) ● Re: water consumption - Canie 08:45:44 - 11/2/2001 (10606) (1) ● Re: water consumption - 2cents 09:53:24 - 11/2/2001 (10614) (1) ● Re: water consumption - Canie 11:27:17 - 11/2/2001 (10618) (1) ● Re: water consumption - 2cents 22:24:12 - 11/3/2001 (10686) (0) ● Re: Comparing a "random" prediction with a "good" prediction - Roger Hunter 12:55:07 - 10/30/2001 (10498) (1) ● Re: Comparing a "random" prediction with a "good" prediction - Lowell 13:44:49 - 10/30/2001 (10499) (0) ● Re: Note from a local seismologist in So. California - Canie 09:18:41 - 10/30/2001 (10489) (1) ● Yes, that's the one NT - Lowell 09:31:07 - 10/30/2001 (10490) (0) |
|
|
|
|
