Re: Comparing a "random" prediction with a "good" prediction
Posted by Roger Hunter on October 30, 2001 at 12:55:07:

Lowell;

While you can reevaluate a miss to get the probability of the best fitting quake you cannot reevaluate a hit and accept that as the probability of the prediction.

I'm sure you know that. I'm posting for the lurkers.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Comparing a "random" prediction with a "good" prediction - Lowell  13:44:49 - 10/30/2001  (10499)  (0)