|
Earthquake activity expected |
Earthquake warning type signals which I detected on November 7 indicate to me that some noticeably strong earthquake activity is probably on the way. The early to middle part of next week looks most likely. Preliminary analyses suggest activity in the western Pacific Ocean area. Some other people are expecting some U.S. West Coast activity. It appears that perhaps half the time, an expected earthquake will occur within a week of the time that the signals that I myself work with are detected. The other half of the time it will often be delayed by some multiple of about 7 days while more strain builds in the fault zone and the sun and moon move into right position once again to be able to trigger the earthquake. One and two month delays are common. Ear Tone data being sent to me by someone else are now being evaluated along with my own data. The results look interesting. At the moment it looks like combining data from multiple sources like that has the potential to produce better forecasts. Follow Ups: ● Update and Recommendations - EQF 10:35:33 - 11/9/2003 (20043) (3) ● Update - EQF 21:43:14 - 11/9/2003 (20049) (2) ● Update - EQF 20:25:19 - 11/10/2003 (20056) (3) ● Update - "All Clear" circulated - EQF 11:49:24 - 11/17/2003 (20133) (0) ● Re: Update - Don in Hollister 20:55:59 - 11/10/2003 (20059) (1) ● Forecasting approaches - EQF 17:44:04 - 11/11/2003 (20067) (1) ● Re: Forecasting approaches - Don in Hollister 23:50:00 - 11/11/2003 (20073) (0) ● some clarification? - John Vidale 20:31:51 - 11/10/2003 (20058) (1) ● Latest theories - EQF 17:06:55 - 11/11/2003 (20064) (2) ● not very convincing - John Vidale 20:01:43 - 11/11/2003 (20071) (1) ● Come now, get serious - EQF 08:58:50 - 11/12/2003 (20077) (1) ● a few basics - John Vidale 10:47:50 - 11/12/2003 (20078) (1) ● Basics indeed! - EQF 12:13:31 - 11/12/2003 (20079) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 13:32:02 - 11/12/2003 (20080) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 16:56:13 - 11/12/2003 (20084) (2) ● challenging Don's credentials? - John Vidale 21:17:31 - 11/12/2003 (20090) (1) ● Re: challenging Don's credentials? - EQF 01:26:10 - 11/13/2003 (20095) (0) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 17:29:05 - 11/12/2003 (20085) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 18:11:09 - 11/12/2003 (20087) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 19:17:17 - 11/12/2003 (20089) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF 01:22:59 - 11/13/2003 (20094) (1) ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister 02:46:49 - 11/13/2003 (20098) (1) ● a scientist - chris in suburbia 09:35:54 - 11/13/2003 (20104) (0) ● Re: Latest theories - Roger Hunter 17:37:55 - 11/11/2003 (20066) (1) ● Celestial data - EQF 17:59:12 - 11/11/2003 (20068) (1) ● Re: Celestial data - Roger Hunter 18:18:55 - 11/11/2003 (20069) (1) ● Re: Celestial data - EQF 19:42:16 - 11/11/2003 (20070) (0) ● Not a good sign - EQF 05:23:20 - 11/10/2003 (20054) (0) ● Forecast credibility - EQF 21:08:03 - 11/9/2003 (20047) (0) ● Thanks - Todd 17:40:53 - 11/9/2003 (20046) (1) ● Re: Thanks - EQF 21:31:33 - 11/9/2003 (20048) (0) ● why multiple of 7 days? - John Vidale 07:45:34 - 11/9/2003 (20038) (1) ● Re: why multiple of 7 days? - EQF 09:56:37 - 11/9/2003 (20040) (0) ● Re: Earthquake activity expected - Don in Hollister 10:14:17 - 11/8/2003 (20031) (1) ● Re: Earthquake activity expected - EQF 05:45:02 - 11/9/2003 (20035) (2) ● Re: Earthquake activity expected - Don in Hollister 16:50:24 - 11/9/2003 (20045) (0) ● Alerts / Warnings & Watches - Petra 09:56:34 - 11/9/2003 (20041) (1) ● Re: Alerts / Warnings & Watches - EQF 10:04:49 - 11/9/2003 (20042) (1) ● Re: Alerts / Warnings & Watches - Petra 12:58:11 - 11/9/2003 (20044) (0) ● EQ Prediction - Hello Eureka! - Petra 01:59:20 - 11/8/2003 (20025) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction - Hello Eureka! - EQF 03:30:15 - 11/8/2003 (20026) (1) ● Re: EQ Prediction - Hello Eureka! - Canie 07:37:32 - 11/8/2003 (20028) (1) ● International effort - EQF 08:31:48 - 11/8/2003 (20030) (0) |
|