Update
Posted by EQF on November 09, 2003 at 21:43:14:

Warning signal activity has been quiet for about 24 hours now.

This was expected because the sun and the moon were closest to being on exact opposite sides of the Earth in the past day. And they are now moving out of that position which in this case was probably promoting the generation of the warning signals. Additionally, I am going to guess that residual geomagnetic storm activity related to those recent strong solar storms is now diminishing in intensity.

So, what effect will this have on the triggering time for the possible earthquake I have been discussing? We will have to watch and see.


Follow Ups:
     ● Update - EQF  20:25:19 - 11/10/2003  (20056)  (3)
        ● Update - "All Clear" circulated - EQF  11:49:24 - 11/17/2003  (20133)  (0)
        ● Re: Update - Don in Hollister  20:55:59 - 11/10/2003  (20059)  (1)
           ● Forecasting approaches - EQF  17:44:04 - 11/11/2003  (20067)  (1)
              ● Re: Forecasting approaches - Don in Hollister  23:50:00 - 11/11/2003  (20073)  (0)
        ● some clarification? - John Vidale  20:31:51 - 11/10/2003  (20058)  (1)
           ● Latest theories - EQF  17:06:55 - 11/11/2003  (20064)  (2)
              ● not very convincing - John Vidale  20:01:43 - 11/11/2003  (20071)  (1)
                 ● Come now, get serious - EQF  08:58:50 - 11/12/2003  (20077)  (1)
                    ● a few basics - John Vidale  10:47:50 - 11/12/2003  (20078)  (1)
                       ● Basics indeed! - EQF  12:13:31 - 11/12/2003  (20079)  (1)
                          ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  13:32:02 - 11/12/2003  (20080)  (1)
                             ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  16:56:13 - 11/12/2003  (20084)  (2)
                                ● challenging Don's credentials? - John Vidale  21:17:31 - 11/12/2003  (20090)  (1)
                                   ● Re: challenging Don's credentials? - EQF  01:26:10 - 11/13/2003  (20095)  (0)
                                ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  17:29:05 - 11/12/2003  (20085)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  18:11:09 - 11/12/2003  (20087)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  19:17:17 - 11/12/2003  (20089)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  01:22:59 - 11/13/2003  (20094)  (1)
                                            ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  02:46:49 - 11/13/2003  (20098)  (1)
                                               ● a scientist - chris in suburbia  09:35:54 - 11/13/2003  (20104)  (0)
              ● Re: Latest theories - Roger Hunter  17:37:55 - 11/11/2003  (20066)  (1)
                 ● Celestial data - EQF  17:59:12 - 11/11/2003  (20068)  (1)
                    ● Re: Celestial data - Roger Hunter  18:18:55 - 11/11/2003  (20069)  (1)
                       ● Re: Celestial data - EQF  19:42:16 - 11/11/2003  (20070)  (0)
     ● Not a good sign - EQF  05:23:20 - 11/10/2003  (20054)  (0)