Come now, get serious
Posted by EQF on November 12, 2003 at 08:58:50:

John, once again, we are talking about vastly different types of technologies. And in part for that reason you should not assume that abecause you are aware of certain types of data that what you are doing or have done or know about applies to what I myself am doing. Additionally, you are incorrect if you think that I don’t know what I am talking about. And time will prove that.

Getting back to technical matters which we ARE close enough on to discuss,

Do you know of a chart somewhere on the Internet which shows what the density of the Earth is as you descend through its various layers etc.

I understand that the Earth has a solid iron core. And I also know enough chemistry and physics to know that solid iron is more dense and heavy then ordinary rock such as what we have in the Earth’s crust and surface going down quite a ways.

Finally the best way to look at this is to think of the Earth as a party balloon which contains some air, water, and a large stone. There is a string tied to the neck of the balloon. And you are twirling it around your head.

The balloon tries to assume the shape of an egg. And the air, water, and stone immediately move to different locations in the balloon relative to you and to the neck of the balloon.

The Earth's crust is the air in the balloon. The liquid rock beneath the crust is the water. And the Earth's core is the large rock. However, unlike with the rock in the balloon the Earth's core is largely fixed in place.

That is what I mean by sun and moon gravity related stress within the Earth. All of the different rotations tend to distort the Earth in one way or another. And strain and stress resulting from that might help trigger earthquakes.

In any case I believe that my data are clearly demonstrating that some force or forces related to sun and moon positions in the sky is triggering many of our earthquakes.


Follow Ups:
     ● a few basics - John Vidale  10:47:50 - 11/12/2003  (20078)  (1)
        ● Basics indeed! - EQF  12:13:31 - 11/12/2003  (20079)  (1)
           ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  13:32:02 - 11/12/2003  (20080)  (1)
              ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  16:56:13 - 11/12/2003  (20084)  (2)
                 ● challenging Don's credentials? - John Vidale  21:17:31 - 11/12/2003  (20090)  (1)
                    ● Re: challenging Don's credentials? - EQF  01:26:10 - 11/13/2003  (20095)  (0)
                 ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  17:29:05 - 11/12/2003  (20085)  (1)
                    ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  18:11:09 - 11/12/2003  (20087)  (1)
                       ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  19:17:17 - 11/12/2003  (20089)  (1)
                          ● Re: Basics indeed! - EQF  01:22:59 - 11/13/2003  (20094)  (1)
                             ● Re: Basics indeed! - Don in Hollister  02:46:49 - 11/13/2003  (20098)  (1)
                                ● a scientist - chris in suburbia  09:35:54 - 11/13/2003  (20104)  (0)