|
Re: Evaluation question |
Lowell; Sound advise as usual, Lowell. There are problems with any solution. I had considered accepting the least probable quake which fell inside an (arbitrary) outer limit. But that leads us to accept a small but unlikely event and ignore a more probable but much larger event. Checking the fault systems is impractical for me to incorporate in a program. I don't have enough information to do it. It is impossible to avoid imposing our judgement on the forecaster due to programming decisions which must be made. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Evaluation question - chris in suburbia 15:36:51 - 3/11/2002 (13578) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 16:57:13 - 3/11/2002 (13579) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Don In Hollister 17:53:25 - 3/11/2002 (13582) (2) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:24:34 - 3/11/2002 (13587) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - Canie 19:11:35 - 3/11/2002 (13584) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:33:33 - 3/11/2002 (13588) (3) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:46:46 - 3/12/2002 (13618) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:13:37 - 3/12/2002 (13626) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:43:12 - 3/13/2002 (13675) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 17:32:26 - 3/13/2002 (13678) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 10:55:41 - 3/14/2002 (13718) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 14:40:12 - 3/14/2002 (13727) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - chris in suburbia 20:03:41 - 3/11/2002 (13590) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Canie 23:39:58 - 3/11/2002 (13592) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - Don In Hollister 19:56:42 - 3/11/2002 (13589) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 05:41:52 - 3/12/2002 (13596) (2) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:49:00 - 3/12/2002 (13619) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:15:31 - 3/12/2002 (13628) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:52:09 - 3/13/2002 (13676) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 17:36:10 - 3/13/2002 (13679) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 10:59:13 - 3/14/2002 (13719) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 14:45:30 - 3/14/2002 (13728) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 20:25:45 - 3/14/2002 (13738) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - Don In Hollister 10:58:53 - 3/12/2002 (13604) (0) |
|