|
Re: Evaluation question |
I think a miss where the earthquake is larger than the prediction is interesting. I don't think a miss on the low end of M2-3 is so interesting. And, for these very small earthquakes you have to worry about detection. There has been some amount of posting on this page of rare California earthquakes (not by Lowell) where the list linked clearly does not have the smaller earthquakes on it, and the one that occurred was smaller than most on the list. You have to also worry about what list is being used-can't have any selection-if there are 3 different magnitudes that are being give you can not select one to best fit the forecast. Chris Follow Ups: ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 16:57:13 - 3/11/2002 (13579) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Don In Hollister 17:53:25 - 3/11/2002 (13582) (2) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:24:34 - 3/11/2002 (13587) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - Canie 19:11:35 - 3/11/2002 (13584) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:33:33 - 3/11/2002 (13588) (3) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:46:46 - 3/12/2002 (13618) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:13:37 - 3/12/2002 (13626) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:43:12 - 3/13/2002 (13675) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 17:32:26 - 3/13/2002 (13678) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 10:55:41 - 3/14/2002 (13718) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 14:40:12 - 3/14/2002 (13727) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - chris in suburbia 20:03:41 - 3/11/2002 (13590) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Canie 23:39:58 - 3/11/2002 (13592) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - Don In Hollister 19:56:42 - 3/11/2002 (13589) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 05:41:52 - 3/12/2002 (13596) (2) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:49:00 - 3/12/2002 (13619) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:15:31 - 3/12/2002 (13628) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:52:09 - 3/13/2002 (13676) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 17:36:10 - 3/13/2002 (13679) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 10:59:13 - 3/14/2002 (13719) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 14:45:30 - 3/14/2002 (13728) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 20:25:45 - 3/14/2002 (13738) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - Don In Hollister 10:58:53 - 3/12/2002 (13604) (0) |
|