Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms
Posted by Lowell on October 05, 2001 at 20:42:18:

Thank you DIB for your comments. Since you appear to be an expert on the
physics of solar-terrestrial interactions, solar and geomagnetic storms and
earthquake physics, your comments are particularly welcome. The insight of
expert knowledge is not something anyone can afford to ignore.
The possibility of spurious data correlations always exists in any hypothesis. There
are many correlations which occur which are quite meaningless, as you know. There are
also some which need to be investigated more thoroughly before they are tossed or
accepted.
Of course, the only way to test any hypothesis, as we all learned early in our
education, is to make predictions which can be tested. That is what this board
is all about, and I will continue to make testable predictions. Only time will tell
if these predictions/forecasts turn out to be correct, but there is no way to know
unless they are made.
If you also have testable predictions/forecasts or hypotheses, I believe every
member of this board would welcome your expertise and examine your hypotheses
as carefully as you have others.
I need not remind all postersthat the success of this board relies on our mutual
respect for one another. I do not believe that criticism aimed at a person should be
tolerated on this board, but remarks critical of an idea or hypothesis, if they can be substantiated are always welcome.
Thank you for your comments. We look forward to additional constructive criticism
from you in this and other matters posted on this board.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - dib  06:04:10 - 10/6/2001  (9789)  (1)
        ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Jen  06:53:58 - 10/6/2001  (9792)  (2)
           ● The Only good science is PC science - Lowell  10:28:39 - 10/6/2001  (9794)  (1)
              ● Re: The Only good science is PC science - dib  16:39:16 - 10/6/2001  (9802)  (2)
                 ● Re: The Only good science is PC science - Cathryn  17:55:08 - 10/6/2001  (9806)  (1)
                    ● Re: The Only good science is PC science - dib  19:02:27 - 10/6/2001  (9808)  (2)
                       ● Re: The Only good science is PC science - Cathryn  10:56:34 - 10/7/2001  (9815)  (0)
                       ● Hats off to Cathryn - Jen  19:38:10 - 10/6/2001  (9809)  (1)
                          ● Re: Hats off to Cathryn - Cathryn  11:01:32 - 10/7/2001  (9816)  (0)
                 ● Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - 2cents  17:51:54 - 10/6/2001  (9805)  (2)
                    ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - dib  23:32:47 - 10/6/2001  (9812)  (2)
                       ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - 2cents  06:22:42 - 10/8/2001  (9829)  (2)
                          ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - Cathryn  16:38:39 - 10/10/2001  (9899)  (1)
                             ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - dib  17:53:42 - 10/10/2001  (9900)  (0)
                          ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - dib  22:15:57 - 10/9/2001  (9875)  (0)
                       ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - Cathryn  11:21:06 - 10/7/2001  (9818)  (1)
                          ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - dib  22:32:26 - 10/9/2001  (9877)  (0)
                    ● Re: Postmortem & Words That Haunt ... - Cathryn  18:04:54 - 10/6/2001  (9807)  (0)
           ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib  08:58:52 - 10/6/2001  (9793)  (1)
              ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Jen  11:10:32 - 10/6/2001  (9795)  (1)
                 ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib  17:28:38 - 10/6/2001  (9804)  (1)
                    ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Canie  09:03:33 - 10/7/2001  (9813)  (1)
                       ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib  09:43:58 - 10/7/2001  (9814)  (1)
                          ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn  11:04:48 - 10/7/2001  (9817)  (1)
                             ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib  22:19:00 - 10/9/2001  (9876)  (2)
                                ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib  21:16:08 - 10/10/2001  (9914)  (0)
                                ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn  16:32:54 - 10/10/2001  (9898)  (1)
                                   ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib  18:50:50 - 10/10/2001  (9905)  (1)
                                      ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn  19:35:08 - 10/10/2001  (9906)  (1)
                                         ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib  20:27:20 - 10/10/2001  (9909)  (1)
                                            ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn  20:52:15 - 10/10/2001  (9910)  (0)
     ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - Lowell  21:20:48 - 10/5/2001  (9786)  (2)
        ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - dib  06:26:14 - 10/6/2001  (9791)  (0)
        ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - EQ-Forecasting  22:50:37 - 10/5/2001  (9788)  (1)
           ● Re: RE to Lowell on Proton Storms - Jen  06:19:25 - 10/6/2001  (9790)  (1)
              ● DITTO ! (NT) - Cathryn  16:40:19 - 10/6/2001  (9803)  (0)