Your argument is exactly the same argument that pseudo-scientists contrive to support their belief in all kinds of weird non-science. And yes, pseudo-science qualifies as bad science. I’m beginning to doubt your scientific credentials if you defend sensitives as worthy of serious scientific investigation. Perhaps you have spent too much time reading New Age psychobabble if you believe that science is bogus, all things are possible in the physical world, and that the reality of the universe exists only in our imagination. Well, it isn’t, they aren’t, and it doesn’t.