Re: Good science versus ???
Posted by Cathryn on October 10, 2001 at 19:35:08:

My dearest Dawn:

>Don in Hollister is an imposter that you should
>beware of and steer clear around the block of.

Or something... Actually, he's quite a nice guy.

>Those earthquakes he is predicting are bogus.

Hmm. Is that why they happen sometime just hours after he predicts them?

>He's found some way of hacking the USGS database, >I'm sure of it.

Ah. So he's manipulating data, now, huh? Sounds suspiciously like something out of a HITCHCOCK movie (if you get my drift).

Shock and alarm! (How does she know?)

>Don't invite him to any more
>soochi dinners.

Actually, I won't. At least not until he invites me to one. Reciprocity and all that.

>And since you mention it, 17 years don't mean a
>thing. I have been married to my wife for 28
>years, and even now her looks of
>disapproval are currently being investigated by
>Cal-Trans for their utility in freeway tunneling
>through the Sierras.

Yes, dearest, I imagine they come not too infrequently. I've known my husband for 33 years. Does that somehow trump your years of wedded bliss?

>Your man is a lucky guy, IMHO.

At last! An opinion with which I can wholly concur. :-)

Sweet dreams, Dearest Dib.

Katharynne


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Good science versus ??? - dib  20:27:20 - 10/10/2001  (9909)  (1)
        ● Re: Good science versus ??? - Cathryn  20:52:15 - 10/10/2001  (9910)  (0)