Re: Congratulations, Jane
Posted by Skywise on July 08, 2006 at 15:19:23:

Errr....if the prediction is for a "5.5-6.2" and the quake is a 7.5, doesn't that make it a miss?

BTW, it's currently listed as a 6.2.

But, my point about claiming a hit outside of the specified magnitude range still applies.

Brian

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Canie  16:12:03 - 7/8/2006  (39195)  (1)
        ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn  16:19:28 - 7/8/2006  (39197)  (1)
           ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise  17:47:21 - 7/8/2006  (39198)  (2)
              ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - chris in suburbia  07:30:37 - 7/9/2006  (39223)  (1)
                 ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise  15:35:33 - 7/11/2006  (39267)  (0)
              ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn  21:38:42 - 7/8/2006  (39203)  (1)
                 ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise  22:22:45 - 7/8/2006  (39205)  (1)
                    ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn  22:45:35 - 7/8/2006  (39207)  (3)
                       ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise  00:06:31 - 7/9/2006  (39213)  (1)
                          ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Roger Hunter  07:20:25 - 7/12/2006  (39287)  (0)
                       ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Brad-sd  23:26:47 - 7/8/2006  (39211)  (1)
                          ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn  01:34:38 - 7/9/2006  (39216)  (0)
                       ● Another Issue - Glen  23:03:57 - 7/8/2006  (39208)  (1)
                          ● Re: Another Issue - Cathryn  01:33:10 - 7/9/2006  (39215)  (0)
     ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Barbara  16:02:10 - 7/8/2006  (39194)  (0)