|
|
|
|
| Re: Congratulations, Jane |
I tend to agree with Canie. Perhaps if eq prediction ever gets more refined, upper limit parameters might have to be taken into account. But at this early stage, I say, Jane, good call! Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise 17:47:21 - 7/8/2006 (39198) (2) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - chris in suburbia 07:30:37 - 7/9/2006 (39223) (1) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise 15:35:33 - 7/11/2006 (39267) (0) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn 21:38:42 - 7/8/2006 (39203) (1) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise 22:22:45 - 7/8/2006 (39205) (1) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn 22:45:35 - 7/8/2006 (39207) (3) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise 00:06:31 - 7/9/2006 (39213) (1) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Roger Hunter 07:20:25 - 7/12/2006 (39287) (0) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Brad-sd 23:26:47 - 7/8/2006 (39211) (1) ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn 01:34:38 - 7/9/2006 (39216) (0) ● Another Issue - Glen 23:03:57 - 7/8/2006 (39208) (1) ● Re: Another Issue - Cathryn 01:33:10 - 7/9/2006 (39215) (0) |
|
|
|
|
