That's a tough issue. I know Roger would not consider it a hit, as this has come up before. Maybe one could/should make allowances for degrees of correctness. For instance if you nail the place and time, but have underestimated the magnitude, maybe that should be a hit when missing on 2 of the three would disqualify it. I am only proposing this for situations in which a quake has been underestimated in magnitude.

Others?

Cathryn