Re: Congratulations, Jane
Posted by Skywise on July 08, 2006 at 17:47:21:

Hmmmm......

I could see being off by something like .3 or so. But if the quake was indeed a 7.5 and the prediction topped out at 6.2, that's a difference of 1.3. That's quite a fudge factor.

What's the point of specifying a magnitude range, then?

Brian

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - chris in suburbia  07:30:37 - 7/9/2006  (39223)  (1)
        ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise  15:35:33 - 7/11/2006  (39267)  (0)
     ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn  21:38:42 - 7/8/2006  (39203)  (1)
        ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise  22:22:45 - 7/8/2006  (39205)  (1)
           ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn  22:45:35 - 7/8/2006  (39207)  (3)
              ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Skywise  00:06:31 - 7/9/2006  (39213)  (1)
                 ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Roger Hunter  07:20:25 - 7/12/2006  (39287)  (0)
              ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Brad-sd  23:26:47 - 7/8/2006  (39211)  (1)
                 ● Re: Congratulations, Jane - Cathryn  01:34:38 - 7/9/2006  (39216)  (0)
              ● Another Issue - Glen  23:03:57 - 7/8/2006  (39208)  (1)
                 ● Re: Another Issue - Cathryn  01:33:10 - 7/9/2006  (39215)  (0)