Pat,

The Antiques said: “in medio stat virtus”.
50% is not modest and is not presumptuosus for an experimental method that, to can do better, had to need much more than the only 1% of data in possess of the scientific community. They truly could do better.
I’m not here for showing off and say: look how much I’m good!
Only God knows the great weight of this gift. I hope every day anyone had find an instrumental method of prediction and free me this worry off.
I love to think to nature, but to external part, done of lights and colours.

When I had to say you: my predictions have alls a chanche 100%, I wished to say that all the signals received are sure to 100% but the difficulty is in the localization of places, some of them I have already localizated, and, like a rhabdomantist feels the underground waters, I’m able to feel the borders of underground seismotectonic elements and to sign the maps.

If I had sign in my prediction a place unknowing to you, what should you do?
You should take an atlas and see in the index, the index should send you back to Lat/Long.
Because this my research is addressed to people of science and not to any common persons I think to do well.

Antonio