Shan, to clarify my position
Posted by Roger Hunter on October 19, 2005 at 07:00:37:

Shan, re your discussion below with Ara:

I don't support your method because I don't fully understand it and because the part I do understand makes no sense.

But that doesn't matter. Success or failure is what counts.

What I can do is plot your predictions on a map and then plot ensuing quakes to show how they do or do not fit.

The map will keep score so at the end we will know how many hits and misses we have. That's only a rough estimate because what is needed is the probability of success and it's different for each prediction in your case.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● And to clarify mine - Ara  07:48:44 - 10/19/2005  (29516)  (1)
        ● Re: And to clarify mine PS about Japan prediction - Ara  08:04:55 - 10/19/2005  (29522)  (1)
           ● Note to Board Members - R.Shanmugasundaram  10:30:42 - 10/19/2005  (29523)  (2)
              ● Re: Note to Board Members - chris in suburbia  07:27:24 - 10/20/2005  (29561)  (1)
                 ● Request to Roger - R.Shanmugasundaram  17:15:31 - 10/20/2005  (29619)  (1)
                    ● Re: Request to Roger - Roger Hunter  18:44:03 - 10/20/2005  (29622)  (1)
                       ● Re: Request to Roger - R.Shanmugasundaram  21:51:47 - 10/20/2005  (29624)  (1)
                          ● Re: Request to Roger - Roger Hunter  22:45:27 - 10/20/2005  (29626)  (2)
                             ● Yup, I confused them - chris in suburbia  08:37:24 - 10/22/2005  (29681)  (0)
                             ● Thank you.. - R.Shanmugasundaram  00:49:32 - 10/21/2005  (29627)  (1)
                                ● Re: Thank you too, Shan - Ara  04:12:48 - 10/21/2005  (29628)  (1)
                                   ● Now Ara, - Roger Hunter  07:49:59 - 10/21/2005  (29630)  (0)
              ● Another Week to Watch! - glen  22:37:49 - 10/19/2005  (29556)  (1)
                 ● Re: Another Week to Watch! - R.Shanmugasundaram  21:57:53 - 10/20/2005  (29625)  (0)