Shan,

"Just plotting occurrence of all earthquakes, Roger does not need my file and he is willing to do something and hence he needed my files, I hope."

Roger needs your file so that he can plot your predictions on the map. I disagree with Roger that the result will be a "rough estimate" -- the result will just be a visual experience watching quakes happening in that area, seeing which ones fall in or out of the window. It won't be an evaluation, thought it would allow each person to intuitively evaluate.

"Though no one supporting my method, but no one cannot hide the truth for a long time whether I am disclosing my method or not."

"The truth" is this: If you do not disclose your method, I cannot know your method.

"I have given details in the board as well as in my website about the work to the extend possible."

You have given incomprehensible tidbits that appear to be suggestive hints as to what you might be thinking. You have not given anything else. Certainly you have not given any details, since even the basic method has not been stated.

Below, is a short list of EW posts which contains statements about your predictions. None of them reveals anything about your method.

Most recently you stated that you are "unable to disclose all the details which were not covered in the referred post at this moment."

It is your choice whether or not to reveal your method. But do not then insist that you have informed people on this board of the details of your method.

You have not done so, and not a single person using this board is able to explain what you are doing.

http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/29142.html
http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/29404.html
http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/29429.html
http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/29265.html
http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/29427.html
http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/29178.html
http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/29199.html