Re: Thank you too, Shan
Posted by Ara on October 21, 2005 at 04:12:48:

Shan,

"Kyushu location was not given by me in any recent predicition posts in the Board and which was given only in my website separately since its comes under lowere magnitude category based on another precursor."

As I already pointed out to you, your website has the Kyushuu location in the lower magnitude category, but your post to this board has the Niigata location
NEAR W. CST EASTERN HONSHU (37.2N 138.6E) in the lower magnitude category.

You attacked me for saying that, but it is a fact. Re-read everything, if you have the time, Shan.

Your post prediction and website prediction are different.

Anyway, as Chris notes, the Kyushuu location is 1000km away from Tokyo and as you say the Niigata location is 265km away from Tokyo.

You have stated that you have a 200km range, so the Tokyo quake is not a "result" for either of those locations.

Two misses.

You are batting zero in Japan, Shan. Even below that, I think.

Unless you want to start again with how 800km away still counts as a result. Then you can choose two locations, and almost all of Japan will fall within your range.

That would be nonsensical and meaningless.


Follow Ups:
     ● Now Ara, - Roger Hunter  07:49:59 - 10/21/2005  (29630)  (0)