|
Re: Seismic activity expected |
At this time I don’t have anything else to report regarding that warning signal. It does not appear to match any other recently detected signals. Certain groups were notified. But I am not presently planning on doing anything else until the time when additional relevant information appears. I can say the following: I have been evaluating Ear Tone data sent to me by other people for a while now. And I feel that the results are extraordinary. The data processing procedures I have developed look like they can produce excellent results. At the moment I also have to say that I do not yet understand what the geophysical processes are which are enabling those procedures to work. Follow Ups: ● Re: Seismic activity expected - chris in suburbia 06:11:43 - 12/14/2003 (20427) (2) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - Tony 19:41:31 - 12/16/2003 (20462) (1) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - chris in suburbia 04:48:08 - 12/17/2003 (20464) (2) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - Tony 21:15:37 - 12/18/2003 (20501) (1) ● paradigms - chris in suburbia 04:45:29 - 12/19/2003 (20507) (0) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - EQF 10:15:40 - 12/17/2003 (20467) (1) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - Roger Hunter 11:13:12 - 12/17/2003 (20469) (1) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - EQF 06:41:41 - 12/18/2003 (20483) (1) ● can't run until you can walk - John Vidale 08:53:23 - 12/18/2003 (20484) (1) ● Try considering a different project - EQF 14:49:10 - 12/18/2003 (20492) (1) ● just posting to agree with Roger and Chris - John Vidale 21:56:01 - 12/18/2003 (20504) (1) ● Re: just posting to agree with Roger and Chris - Don in Hollister 22:18:58 - 12/18/2003 (20505) (0) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - EQF 12:49:10 - 12/15/2003 (20450) (0) |
|