|
Re: Seismic activity expected |
EQF-these kinds of posts really are not very useful, or interesting. I suppose I could just not read them, but occassionaly you post something worth reading. But, if you would be more selective, you would waste a lot less of your time, and a little less of ours. Chris Follow Ups: ● Re: Seismic activity expected - Tony 19:41:31 - 12/16/2003 (20462) (1) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - chris in suburbia 04:48:08 - 12/17/2003 (20464) (2) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - Tony 21:15:37 - 12/18/2003 (20501) (1) ● paradigms - chris in suburbia 04:45:29 - 12/19/2003 (20507) (0) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - EQF 10:15:40 - 12/17/2003 (20467) (1) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - Roger Hunter 11:13:12 - 12/17/2003 (20469) (1) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - EQF 06:41:41 - 12/18/2003 (20483) (1) ● can't run until you can walk - John Vidale 08:53:23 - 12/18/2003 (20484) (1) ● Try considering a different project - EQF 14:49:10 - 12/18/2003 (20492) (1) ● just posting to agree with Roger and Chris - John Vidale 21:56:01 - 12/18/2003 (20504) (1) ● Re: just posting to agree with Roger and Chris - Don in Hollister 22:18:58 - 12/18/2003 (20505) (0) ● Re: Seismic activity expected - EQF 12:49:10 - 12/15/2003 (20450) (0) |
|