Re: Roger-correlation with largest flares?
Posted by chris in suburbia on October 29, 2003 at 17:30:53:

Don, check with Roger to see what he is interested in doing. But, it is too hard to look at a list of earthquakes like this-instead, we need the number of earthquakes over some magnitude vs days from flare. That can be graphed. Then, we might need to look at the peaks on the graph and see where the earthquakes are occurring-whether it is one large quake with a lot of aftershocks, or a lot of quakes in different areas. Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Roger-correlation with largest flares? - Canie  19:45:35 - 10/31/2003  (19938)  (1)
        ● Canie flare correlation - chris in suburbia  06:00:22 - 11/1/2003  (19940)  (2)
           ● Re: Canie flare correlation - Canie  22:02:35 - 11/1/2003  (19951)  (0)
           ● Different types of geomagnetic storms - EQF  07:57:19 - 11/1/2003  (19941)  (2)
              ● Re: Different types of geomagnetic storms - chris in suburbia  10:36:12 - 11/1/2003  (19944)  (1)
                 ● Re: Different types of geomagnetic storms - EQF  12:28:55 - 11/1/2003  (19945)  (0)
              ● Re: Different types of geomagnetic storms - chris in suburbia  10:35:37 - 11/1/2003  (19942)  (0)
     ● Re: Roger-correlation with largest flares? - Roger Hunter  18:07:50 - 10/29/2003  (19915)  (1)
        ● cumulative plot - chris in suburbia  11:08:05 - 10/30/2003  (19919)  (1)
           ● On the way. n/t - Roger Hunter  11:07:17 - 10/31/2003  (19931)  (1)
              ● flares and quakes - chris in suburbia  13:23:27 - 10/31/2003  (19933)  (0)